Abstract

This study compared effects of plasma-activated medium (PAM) with effects of conventional clinical thermal therapy on both lung cancer cells and benign cells for management of malignant pleural effusion (MPE). For MPE treatment, chemotherapy, photodynamic therapy, and thermal therapy are used but caused systemic side effects, patient photosensitivity, and edema, respectively. Recent studies show that plasma induces apoptosis in cancer cells with minor effects on normal cells and is cost-effective. However, the effects of plasma on MPE have not been investigated previously. This study applied a nonthermal atmospheric-pressure plasma jet to treat RPMI medium to produce PAM, carefully controlled the long-life reactive oxygen and nitrogen species concentration in PAM, and treated the cells. The influence of PAM treatment on the microenvironment of cells was also checked. The results indicated that PAM selectively inhibited CL1–5 and A549 cells, exerting minor effects on benign mesothelial and fibroblast cells. In contrast to selective lethal effects of PAM, thermal therapy inhibited both CL1–5 and benign mesothelial cells. This study also found that fibroblast growth factor 1 is not the factor explaining why PAM can selectively inhibit CL1–5 cells. These results indicate that PAM is potentially a less-harmful and cost-effective adjuvant therapy for MPE.

Highlights

  • This study compared effects of plasma-activated medium (PAM) with effects of conventional clinical thermal therapy on both lung cancer cells and benign cells for management of malignant pleural effusion (MPE)

  • It is interesting that indirectly treating cancer cells with PAM reportedly has similar effects to direct plasma t­reatments[46,47], which may broaden the therapeutic application of plasma for therapies in the body

  • We measured the concentrations of reactive oxygen and nitrogen species (RONS) in PAM in an attempt to understand the effects of the RONS dosage

Read more

Summary

Introduction

This study compared effects of plasma-activated medium (PAM) with effects of conventional clinical thermal therapy on both lung cancer cells and benign cells for management of malignant pleural effusion (MPE). The results indicated that PAM selectively inhibited CL1–5 and A549 cells, exerting minor effects on benign mesothelial and fibroblast cells. This study found that fibroblast growth factor 1 is not the factor explaining why PAM can selectively inhibit CL1–5 cells These results indicate that PAM is potentially a less-harmful and cost-effective adjuvant therapy for MPE. The presence of a space-occupying liquid in the pleural space results in the compression of normal lung and limits the movement of respiratory muscles, such as ­diaphragm[5] For these reasons, dyspnea is the most common symptom in patients with massive malignant pleural effusion (MPE). PDT has several disadvantages, including skin and eye sensitivity to light, pain to nearby healthy tissue, and high cost

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call