Abstract
The brown planthopper (Nilaparvata lugens, BPH) and small brown planthopper (Laodelphax striatellus, SBPH) are major pests of rice (Oryza sativa) in Asia. These piercing-sucking insects secrete saliva into the host during feeding. Nevertheless, it is largely unknown how planthoppers use salivary effectors to enable continuous feeding on rice. Here, we screened their salivary proteomes and selected eight salivary proteins conserved between SBPH and BPH as candidate effectors. Silencing calmodulin (CaM) impeded BPH and SBPH from penetrating the phloem. Hence, their food intake, survival, and fecundity on rice plants were reduced. By contrast, CaM silencing had a small effect on the survival rate of BPH and SBPH raised on artificial diet. The CaM amino acid sequences were the same for both BPH and SBPH. CaM was highly expressed in their salivary glands and secreted into the rice plants during feeding. Bacterially expressed recombinant CaM protein exhibited calcium-binding activity. In planta expression disclosed that CaM was localized to the plant cytoplasms and nuclei and suppressed plant defenses such as hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) accumulation and callose deposition. CaM-silenced BPH and SBPH nymphs elicited relatively high levels of H2O2 and callose accumulation in rice plants. The foregoing results reveal that CaM is an effector as it enables the planthopper to reach the phloem by suppressing callose deposition and H2O2 accumulation in rice.
Highlights
Effector Calmodulin Impairs Rice Defense of insect salivary proteins may help elucidate the mechanisms by which insects modulate host plant defenses
The conserved salivary proteins CaM, enolase, stubble-2, placental protein 11 (PP11), α-N-acetylgalactosaminidase (NAGA), carboxylesterase, regucalcin, and trypsin-26 were selected for RNA interference (RNAi) application in SBPH nymphs
Morphological defect and lethality were virtually undetectable in the dsGFPinjected SBPH nymph control throughout the test period
Summary
Plants and herbivorous insects have been engaged in a long-term arms race. Plants have developed defensive mechanisms, but insects have evolved various strategies to counteract them. Recent research has generated abundant information regarding insect effectors and elicitors, especially those produced by piercing-sucking insects These substances may positively (Ji et al, 2017, 2021; Ye et al, 2017; Huang et al, 2019; Wang et al, 2019; Xu et al, 2019; Tian et al, 2021) or negatively (Bos et al, 2010; Chaudhary et al, 2014; Rao et al, 2019; Guo et al, 2020) affect insect feeding performance on plant hosts. Such interactions resemble those occurring between microbial pathogens and their host plants
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
