Abstract

Abstract Background/Question/Methods Wetlands can store a lot of carbon in soils, but wetland microbial respiration also releases a great deal of carbon dioxide (CO~2~) and methane (CH~4~). These gases combined are responsible for ~80% of the radiative climate forcing. Understanding the controls on microbial respiration and the importance of different metabolic pathways has important climate change implications. Plants affect microbial respiration in wetlands by impacting the available soil carbon pool and the redoximorphic conditions of the soil environment. These plant impacts in turn affect microbial competition. In this study we were particularly interested in determining the role of soil carbon quality versus environmental factors in influencing the relative contributions of denitrification, iron reduction, sulfate reduction, and methanogenesis to overall microbial respiration in a freshwater tidal wetland (Jug Bay) and a brackish marsh (Jack Bay) on the Chesapeake Bay, USA. We collected soils from each site, homogenized them, and buried samples at their original location or at the opposite location. A year and a half later samples were collected (October, 2008) and analyzed for the amount of respiration contributed by different metabolic pathways. Results/Conclusions Overall microbial respiration rates were higher in the soil with the higher carbon content (Jack Bay average soil organic matter = 54%; Jug Bay = 18%). However, when normalized to soil carbon content, respiration rates were actually higher for the soil with lower carbon content at both locations (Jack Bay soils total carbon respired = 4.4 umols per g soil C per day; Jug Bay soils = 7.4 umols per g soil C per day). These results suggest that carbon quality, more than quantity or environmental factors such as sulfate availability, drives microbial respiration rates. We conclude that plant carbon inputs to soils have a lasting legacy on microbial competition in wetlands.

Highlights

  • Microbial Respiration Get energy by transferring electrons from a donor to an acceptor Aerobic respirationC6H12O6 + 6O2 → 6CO2 + 6H2O e- donor e- acceptor Telegraph.uk.co Khamaid.orgMicrobial Respiration Anaerobic respiration: multiple pathways Different pathways compete for:– Common donors: acetate and H2 – Common acceptors: NO3, Fe(III), SO4, CO2 Competition for substrates favors pathways with more energy yield– NO3 > Fe(III) > SO4 > HCO3/CO2

  • We see the highest rates of decomposition at brackish site and similar rates for both soils whether they were transplanted or not

  • How do these rates differ if we account for the large differences in soil carbon? (Freshwater Site soil organic matter ~18% Brackish Site soil organic matter ~54%)

Read more

Summary

Background

Anaerobic respiration: multiple pathways Different pathways compete for:. Wetlands sequester carbon But microbial processes emit CO2 and CH4 CH4 8x the radiative forcing of CO2 Other microbial pathways can outcompete methanogenesis. Anaerobic respiration: multiple pathways Different pathways compete for:. What conditions promote these alternative metabolic pathways that are more climate friendly?. Brackish site: smooth cordgrass (Spartina alterniflora) and salt grass (Distichlis spicata). Freshwater site: arrow arum (Peltandra virginica) and pickerel weed (Pontederia cordata)

Results
Conclusions

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.