Abstract
Abstract Top‐down and bottom‐up forces in tropical savannas have shaped the evolution of traits that enable plants to thrive in environments where soils are poor, dry seasons are long, fire is frequent, woody plants and grasses compete and herbivores range from cryptic caterpillars to elephants that topple entire trees. African savannas and the South American cerrado have similar climates and fire regimes, but differ in the presence of large mammal herbivores, which are mostly extinct in the cerrado. These biomes offer an instructive comparison to understand how plant defence traits evolved in response to differential herbivore pressure. Within Africa, mammalian herbivore pressure also differs across savannas, being lower in the miombo relative to more open, mixed savannas. The dominance of specialist insect herbivores in the cerrado, relative to the more generalist mammalian herbivores in Africa, suggests that defence traits will differ between savannas in accordance with herbivore identity and pressure. Wood is densest in mixed African savannas, as expected because large mammals often damage trees. Specific leaf area, related to palatability, is higher in mixed African savannas and the cerrado relative to the miombo, while leaf N is surprisingly higher in miombo species. Ant mutualists are important defences in mixed African savannas and the cerrado. Defensive chemistry has received less attention in the trait literature. Foliar phenolics, the most commonly studied chemical defences in savannas, vary in their efficacy. New analyses isolating specific compounds are informative as is the evaluation of phytochemical diversity as a defence. There are indications that phytochemical defences are more diverse in the cerrado, which may be related to greater specialization of cerrado herbivores. Synthesis. The dominance of specialist insect herbivores in the cerrado, relative to generalist mammalian herbivores in Africa, selected for different plant defence traits, contributing to the separation of species along the leaf economics spectrum and demonstrating the importance of plant defences as plant functional traits. African savanna species seem to follow a more acquisitive strategy, followed by miombo species. Cerrado species appear to follow a more conservative strategy with greater investments in tough leaves and chemical defences.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.