Abstract

Nowadays Distribution generation (DG) has achieved to further precious awareness, especially inside the power system fields, so the strength and dependability specifically in the distribution system. Optimum scheduling of DG not only focuses on the size of DG only too puts a load on the optimal location of generators. Install for DG at the optimum location along with optimal size into the distribution system would improve the system performance and also give price effectual solved to the planning of the distribution network. The positive impact of optimum DG position into the distribution system would improve system voltage profile, reduction in line losses, improved power standard, make better reliability and strength of the distribution network. GWO is modeled based on the unique hunt, searching for a target, encircling target, and attacking prey, are executing to perform the optimization. The GWO is determined to the IEEE-16, 30, 57 and 118-bus test systems radial distribution network as well as considering multiplier DG units in the system. The better study outcome of the attained to without DG, with DG, type 1 DG, type 2 DG, with type 3 DG at 0.9 pf and with type DG at unity pf. Moreover, the obtained is compared as well as the net outcome of the proposed procedure for the sequence to see the efficiency and effectual and the distribution systems.

Highlights

  • As we know that nowadays the power generation and transmission systems are in operation under more and more emphasize state and are experiencing to rise the power loss due to increasing demand, environmental and economic or financial restriction, along with a competitor energy industry [1], so there are some needs to make better power demand, the standard of power, and preferably the growing of Distribution generation (DG) and the problems of global warming to the environment

  • The result shows that size of DG is maximum at lagging pf and as well as the compared size of DG to get at unity pf the DG losses are reduction at lagging pf rather than at unity pf with DG, with due to reactive power attainable local to the loads minimizing the reactive power obtainable from the substation

  • A novel nature encourages in GWO algorithm modeled based on the objective function is used to analyzing the optimum location, size of DG, it’s the minimization of system power loss and gets a better voltage profile

Read more

Summary

Introduction

As we know that nowadays the power generation and transmission systems are in operation under more and more emphasize state and are experiencing to rise the power loss due to increasing demand, environmental and economic or financial restriction, along with a competitor energy industry [1], so there are some needs to make better power demand, the standard of power, and preferably the growing of DG and the problems of global warming to the environment. To determine the optimum DG allocation optimum bus location and more size of DG units and reduced the total power loss in the distribution systems [4]. Decreasing the loss of energy and better voltage profile to the distributions system has prepared the multi-objective function (MOF) [16, 17]. The proposed methods that have been applied on standard IEEE-16, 30, 57 and 118 radial bus test distribution systems along considering multiplier DG power losses minimization and get a better voltage profile improvement. Comparison results along with type 3 DG at 0.9 pf and with type DG at unity pf obtained by the proposed algorithm along with the optimum location and size of DG as obtained by the GWO is more effective and voltage profile. The detail explanation analysis and parameters of IEEE-16, 30, 57 and 118 bus distribution system percentage loss reductions and convergence characteristics curves respectively and Sect. 5 has been present in conclusion

Result and Discussions
Problem Formulation
Constraints
Equality Constraints
Grey Wolf Optimizations Methods
Execution of the GWO for Optimum DG Allotment
Step 6—Ending
Step 3—Standard Explanations
Step 5—Calculate the New Location of Search Agents
IEEE‐16 Bus System
IEEE‐30 Bus System
IEEE‐57 Bus System
IEEE‐118 Bus System
Percentage Loss Reductions
Convergence Characteristics Curves
Findings
10 Conclusions
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call