Abstract
Tensions between the well-being of present humans, future humans, and nonhuman nature manifest in social protests and political and academic debates over the future of Earth. The increasing consumption of natural resources no longer increases, let alone equalises, human well-being, but has led to the current ecological crisis and harms both human and nonhuman well-being. While the crisis has been acknowledged, the existing conceptual frameworks are in some respects ill-equipped to address the crisis in a way that would link the resolving of the crisis with the pivotal aim of promoting equal well-being. The shortcomings of the existing concepts in this respect relate to anthropocentric normative orientation, methodological individualism that disregards process dynamics and precludes integrating the considerations of human and nonhuman well-being, and the lack of multiscalar considerations of well-being. This work derives and proposes the concept of planetary well-being to address the aforementioned conceptual issues, to recognise the moral considerability of both human and nonhuman well-being, and to promote transdisciplinary, cross-cultural discourse for addressing the crisis and for promoting societal and cultural transformation. Conceptually, planetary well-being shifts focus on well-being from individuals to processes, Earth system and ecosystem processes, that underlie all well-being. Planetary well-being is a state where the integrity of Earth system and ecosystem processes remains unimpaired to a degree that species and populations can persist to the future and organisms have the opportunity to achieve well-being. After grounding and introducing planetary well-being, this work shortly discusses how the concept can be operationalised and reflects upon its potential as a bridging concept between different worldviews.
Highlights
Human activities dominate Earth: less than one-quarter of the land area remains free from significant direct human impact, and by 2050 this area is projected to shrink to
Human actions threaten to cause irreversible changes in the Earth system, with critical safety limits exceeded for biosphere integrity, biochemical flows, climate change, and land system change (Rockstrom et al, 2009; Steffen et al, 2015; O’Neill et al, 2018; IPCC, 2019). Crossing such boundaries may lead to irreversible changes in the Earth system (Steffen et al, 2015; O’Neill et al, 2018)
While we do not discuss the status of domesticated nature here, we note that many domesticated animals are not able to realise their characteristics and capacities, and ecosystem modification may interfere with ecosystem processes that are critical for the satisfaction of the needs of wild nonhuman nature
Summary
Human activities dominate Earth: less than one-quarter of the land area remains free from significant direct human impact, and by 2050 this area is projected to shrink to
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.