Abstract
ObjectiveTo compare the management and outcomes of women with placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) in France and the UK.DesignTwo population‐based cohorts.SettingAll obstetrician‐led hospitals in the UK and maternity hospitals in eight French regions.PopulationA cohort of 219 women with PAS in France and a cohort of 154 women with PAS in the UK.MethodsThe management and outcomes of women with PAS were compared between the UK and France.Main outcome measuresMedian blood loss, severe postpartum haemorrhage (≥3 l), postpartum infection and damage to surrounding organs.ResultsThe management of PAS differed between the two countries: a larger proportion of women with PAS in the UK had a caesarean hysterectomy compared with France (43% vs 26%, p < 0.001), whereas in France a larger proportion of women with PAS received a uterus‐preserving approach compared with the UK (36% vs 19%, p < 0.001). The total median blood loss in the UK was 3 l (IQR 1.7–6.5 l), compared with 1 l (IQR 0.5–2.5 l) in France; more women with PAS had a severe postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) in the UK compared with women with PAS in France (58% vs 21%, p < 0.001) [Correction added on 06 May 2022, after first online publication: ‘24 hour’ has been changed to ‘total’ in the preceding sentence]. There was no difference between the UK and French populations for postpartum infection or organ damage.ConclusionsThe UK and France have very different approaches to managing PAS, with more women in France receiving a uterine‐conserving approach and more women in the UK undergoing caesarean hysterectomy. A life‐threatening haemorrhage was more common in the UK than in France, which may be the result of differential management and/or the organisation of the healthcare systems.In women with placenta accreta spectrum, severe haemorrhage was more common in the UK than in France.Tweetable abstractIn women with placenta accreta spectrum, severe haemorrhage was more common in the UK than in France.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.