Abstract

Placement of a stent within a flow diverter has been described previously but its consequences have not been analyzed. We evaluated the clinical and angiographic results of stent placement within a flow diverter during the same treatment session. All patients treated with a Surpass flow diverter were retrospectively evaluated. Patients with previously deployed stents and procedures in which scaffolding stents, a second flow diverter, or intrasaccular devices were used were excluded. Patient and aneurysm characteristics and clinical and imaging follow-up results were compared between stented and nonstented Surpass flow-diverter groups and stent assisted coiling. Thirty-five patients (41 aneurysms) were treated with a Surpass flow diverter only (monotherapy group), and in 33 patients (35 aneurysms), a stent was placed within the Surpass flow diverter (stented group). Stents were placed inside the Surpass flow diverter for a variety of reasons at the operator's discretion. No statistical difference was noted between the 2 groups in age, body weight, sex, history of thromboembolic events, smoking, platelet inhibition levels, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes mellitus, malignancy, and aneurysm location. Aneurysms in the stented group were larger than those in the monotherapy group (14.8 versus 9.1 mm, P < .001). The rate of clinically significant adverse events and complete aneurysm occlusion rates at 0-3 and 3-6 months (73.3% versus 61.3%, P = .31, and 84.8% versus 70.2%, P = .14) were similar. At 9-12 months, a significantly higher proportion of aneurysms in the stented group achieved complete occlusion (93.9% versus 73.2%, P = .019). There was a trend toward a higher obliteration rate on final follow-up in the stented group (93.9% versus 82.9%, P = .14). Placement of a stent within a flow diverter increases the rate of aneurysm occlusion. We propose that these results are from improved flow-diverter apposition due to the higher radial force of intracranial stents.

Highlights

  • MethodsAll patients treated with a Surpass flow diverter were retrospectively evaluated. Patients with previously deployed stents and procedures in which scaffolding stents, a second flow diverter, or intrasaccular devices were used were excluded

  • BACKGROUND AND PURPOSEPlacement of a stent within a flow diverter has been described previously but its consequences have not been analyzed

  • Thirty-five patients (41 aneurysms) were treated with a Surpass flow diverter only, and in 33 patients (35 aneurysms), a stent was placed within the Surpass flow diverter

Read more

Summary

Methods

All patients treated with a Surpass flow diverter were retrospectively evaluated. Patients with previously deployed stents and procedures in which scaffolding stents, a second flow diverter, or intrasaccular devices were used were excluded. Patient and aneurysm characteristics and clinical and imaging follow-up results were compared between stented and nonstented Surpass flow-diverter groups and stent assisted coiling. All patients treated with a single type of flow diverter (Surpass; Stryker Neurovascular, Kalamazoo, Michigan) for an intracranial aneurysm in a single institution by a single operator between May 2013 and September 2017 were identified and evaluated retrospectively. Patients treated by placement of a flow diverter inside a scaffolding stent, adjunctive use of a second flow diverter (telescopic flow diverters), treatment with a flow diverter other than the Surpass device; those with ruptured aneurysms in the acute phase, patients previously treated by stent-assisted coiling, or those treated endosaccularly during the same session were excluded from the study, whereas tandem aneurysms were included and evaluated as separate aneurysms. An anterior circulation aneurysm was defined as an aneurysm originating from arteries of the carotid circulation, including aneurysms of the posterior communicating artery

Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call