Abstract

Much new work in urban and regional economics has emphasized the importance of place prosperity. This study focuses on the determinants of adult poverty and the contribution of place prosperity in damping the intergenerational transmission of poverty. Childhood poverty is a major predictor of adult poverty. We consider how such intergenerational transmission is affected by metropolitan and neighborhood (census tract) prosperity. To capture the temporal dynamics of this process, the model explored here is recursive in nature. We use longitudinal microdata from the Panel Study of Income Dynamics. Location variables at the census tract and metropolitan levels, family variables, and poverty status are observed for our subjects over multiple years both in childhood and adulthood. Neighborhood and metropolitan prosperity are measured in terms of average incomes adjusted for purchasing power parity differences. The standardized neighborhood prosperity direct effect on adult poverty is strongly significant and its total effect is twice as large. On the other hand, the standardized direct effect of metropolitan prosperity and its total effect are small and insignificant. But even neighborhood effects are modest compared to standardized effects of childhood poverty, race, mother’s education and own education. At least with respect to these data, the recent emphasis on place variables would seem to be overstated.

Highlights

  • IntroductionA range of studies emphasize the importance of place prosperity in the intergenerational transmission of poverty (for example, Chetty et al (2014); Chetty and Hendren (2018a);(c) Southern Regional Science Association 2021 ISSN 1553-0892, 0048-49X (online) www.srsa.org/rrsTILAHUN ET AL: PLACE PROSPERITY AND INTERGENERATIONAL POVERTYChetty et al (2016); Cutler and Glaeser (1997); Jencks and Mayer (1990); Sampson et al (2002); Sharkey (2008); Sharkey and Elwert (2011); Wilson (1987)

  • Place prosperity experienced in childhood at both the Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs) level and the Census Tract level influence the extent of adult poverty

  • These direct, indirect and mediated effects are consistent with much literature on the intergenerational transmission of poverty

Read more

Summary

Introduction

A range of studies emphasize the importance of place prosperity in the intergenerational transmission of poverty (for example, Chetty et al (2014); Chetty and Hendren (2018a);(c) Southern Regional Science Association 2021 ISSN 1553-0892, 0048-49X (online) www.srsa.org/rrsTILAHUN ET AL: PLACE PROSPERITY AND INTERGENERATIONAL POVERTYChetty et al (2016); Cutler and Glaeser (1997); Jencks and Mayer (1990); Sampson et al (2002); Sharkey (2008); Sharkey and Elwert (2011); Wilson (1987). A range of studies emphasize the importance of place prosperity in the intergenerational transmission of poverty (for example, Chetty et al (2014); Chetty and Hendren (2018a);. A variety of policies have been deployed to combat poverty and its root causes since the War on Poverty was officially declared more than 50 years ago. Despite these efforts, the rapid reduction in the overall poverty rate that occurred through the 50s and 60s leveled off in the 70s and the poverty rate has been fluctuating in the range of 10-15% since (Semega et al, 2017). Though much of this poverty experience is transient, for a segment of the population, poverty is persistent

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call