Abstract

This scoping review examines the strength of evidence for the effectiveness of public policy-led place-based initiatives designed to improve outcomes for disadvantaged children, their families and the communities in which they live. Study designs and methods for evaluating such place-based initiatives were assessed, along with the contexts in which initiatives were implemented and evaluated. Thirty-two reports relating to 12 initiatives were included. Eleven initiatives used a quasi-experimental evaluation to assess impact, although there were considerable design variations within this. The remaining initiative used a pre- and post- evaluation design. Place-based initiatives by definition aim to improve multiple and interrelated outcomes. We examined initiatives to determine what outcomes were measured and coded them within the five domains of pregnancy and birth, child, parent, family and community. Across the 83 outcomes reported in the 11 studies with a comparison group, 30 (36.4%) demonstrated a positive outcome, and all but one initiative demonstrated a positive outcome in at least one outcome measure. Of the six studies that examined outcomes more than once post baseline, 10 from 38 outcomes (26.3%) demonstrated positive sustained results. Many initiatives were affected by external factors such as policy and funding changes, with unknown impact on their effectiveness. Despite the growth of place-based initiatives to improve outcomes for disadvantaged children, the evidence for their effectiveness remains inconclusive.

Highlights

  • Socio-economic disadvantage clusters within families and the areas where they live [1]

  • We examined the evidence for the effectiveness of public policy driven placebased initiatives for children, while examining the study designs and methods used to evaluate the initiatives, and the context in which the initiatives were implemented and evaluated

  • While RCTs are considered the gold standard for assessing the effectiveness of single, welldefined interventions, such approaches are less appropriate for large complex public health interventions [73]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Socio-economic disadvantage clusters within families and the areas where they live [1]. Disadvantage is becoming increasingly geographically concentrated [2, 3], with neighbourhood disadvantage exacerbating the challenges families face [2, 4] and contributing to intergenerational poverty.

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call