Abstract

Purpose: The few studies comparing CT and MR in the diagnosis of pituitary microadenomas give discordant results. This prospective study compares the value of dynamic serial CT (DSCT), conventional CT (CCT), pre-Gd T1-weighted spin echo (T1SE-Gd) and post-Gd T1-weighted SE (T1SE+Gd) in the detection of pituitary microadenomas. Methods: The value of CT and MR was assessed in 17 cases, with the surgical confirmation as reference. The CTs and MRs were independently and blindly evaluated by two neuroradiologists. Because the finding at MR and/or CT influenced the selection of patients for surgery, the positive predictive value was calculated. The sensitivity calculation applies only for a specific group of postsurgical patients with positive CT and/or MR (marked with an asterisk for these reasons). Results: In this study, the highest sensitivity ∗ (88% and 82%, respectively, for observes I and II) was achieved by DSCT. The T1SE-Gd and T1SE+Gd (evaluated separately) were slightly inferior (sensitivity ∗ of 76% for observer I). The combination of T1SE-Gd with T1SE+Gd improved the sensitivity ∗ to 94% and 82%, respectively, for observers I and II. There was also moderate improvement of sensitivity ∗ by combination of DSCT with conventional CT (94% for observer I). Conclusion: These results suggest that rapid injection of a large amount of contrast conjointly with a fast scanning through the pituitary is crucial for the confident detection of microprolactinomas. Taking into account the similar results of the comination DSCT + CT and T1SE-Gd + T1SE+Gd in the detection of microprolactinomas, high field MRI is the first step modality in the evaluation of presumed hypophyseal hyperprolactinemia.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.