Abstract

SummaryImmunotherapies comprise of a class of cancer therapies that are increasingly used for treatment of several cancer entities. Active immunotherapies encompassing immune checkpoint inhibitors are the most widespread class of immunotherapies, with indications for melanoma, non-small lung cancer, renal cell carcinoma, urothelial carcinoma, head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, and Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Immune checkpoint inhibitors have demonstrated unique response patterns that are not adequately captured by traditional response criteria such das the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) and World Health Organization criteria. Consequently, adaptions of these criteria have been released such as the immune-related RECIST and immune RECIST, which account for the specialities of immunotherapies. Immunotherapies can cause a distinct set of adverse events such as pneumonitis, colitis, and hypophysitis. In addition, atypical treatment response patterns termed pseudoprogression have been observed. Thereby, new or enlarging lesions appear after treatment start and mimic tumor progression, which is followed by an eventual decrease in total tumor burden. In this review article we will describe pitfalls in the radiological response assessment of immunotherapies, focusing on pseudoprogression and imaging appearances of common immune-related adverse events.

Highlights

  • Pitfalls in the radiological response assessment of immunotherapyReceived: 19 December 2017 / Accepted: 6 February 2018 / Published online: 21 March 2018

  • Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors; immune related response criteria (irRC) Immune-Related RECIST; iRECIST immune RECIST; PD progressive disease; CR complete response; SD stable disease; iUPD unconfirmed immune PD; iCPD confirmed immune PD; SPD sum of the products of diameters cancer treatments that was followed by the approval of immune-checkpoint inhibitors for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), renal cell cancer, urothelial carcinoma, head and neck cancer, and Hodgkin’s lymphoma in various stages [2,3,4,5]

  • Immunotherapies are being used in clinical trials and as second- or third-line therapies, and as a first-line treatment option [7]. This highlights the necessity for radiologist, and for clinicians to become familiar with the characteristics of radiological response assessment

Read more

Summary

Pitfalls in the radiological response assessment of immunotherapy

Received: 19 December 2017 / Accepted: 6 February 2018 / Published online: 21 March 2018. Immune checkpoint inhibitors have demonstrated unique response patterns that are not adequately captured by traditional response criteria such das the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) and World Health Organization criteria. Adaptions of these criteria have been released such as the immune-related RECIST and immune RECIST, which account for the specialities of immunotherapies. Immunotherapies can cause a distinct set of adverse events such as pneumonitis, colitis, and hypophysitis. Atypical treatment response patterns termed pseudoprogression have been observed.

Cancer immunotherapy
Partial Response
Clinical stability is considered in whether treatment is continued after iUPD
Radiological response assessment
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call