Abstract

RationaleWe aimed to define the impact of variable arterial input function on myocardial perfusion severity that may misguide interventional decisions and relates to limited capacity of 3D PET for high-count arterial input function of standard bolus R-82. MethodsWe used GE Discovery-ST 16 slice PET-CT, serial 2D and 3D acquisitions of variable Rb-82 dose in a dynamic circulating arterial function model, static resolution and uniformity phantoms, and in patients with dipyridamole stress to quantify per-pixel rest and stress cc·min−1·g−1, CFR and CFC with (+) and (−) 10% simulated change in arterial input. ResultsFor intermediate, border zone severity of stress perfusion, CFR and CFC comprising 7% of 3987 cases, simulated arterial input variability of ± 10% may cause over or underestimation of perfusion severity altering interventional decisions. In phantom tests, current 3D PET has capacity for quantifying high activity of arterial input and high-count per-pixel values of perfusion metrics per artery or branches. ConclusionsAccurate, reproducible arterial input function is essential for at least 7% of patients at thresholds of perfusion severity for optimally guiding interventions and providing high-activity regional per-pixel perfusion metrics by 3D PET for displaying complex quantitative perfusion readily understood (“owned”) by interventionalists to guide procedures.

Highlights

  • Positron emission tomography (PET) quantifies regional absolute myocardial perfusion in ccÁmin-1Ág-1, coronary flow reserve (CFR) and their combination as coronary flow capacity (CFC) associated with reduced mortality after revascularization compared to medical treatment[1] and differentiates focal, diffuse, and small vessel disease.[2]

  • The authors have provided an audio summary of the article, which is available to download as ESM, or to listen to via the JNC/ASNC Podcast

  • Our results suggest that ± 10% variability of arterial input function has little impact on less severe abnormalities of stress perfusion, CFR or CFC for which angiogram or interventions are unlikely

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Positron emission tomography (PET) quantifies regional absolute myocardial perfusion in ccÁmin-1Ág-1, coronary flow reserve (CFR) and their combination as coronary flow capacity (CFC) associated with reduced mortality after revascularization compared to medical treatment[1] and differentiates focal, diffuse, and small vessel disease.[2] The arterial input function is widely recognized as essential for quantitative myocardial perfusion[3] with an extensive literature that, does not resolve several issues for Rb-82 imaging. The ROI is located by back projection from later myocardial images onto first pass images targeting the left atrium or the LV atrio-ventricular valve plane. These time activity curves are fit to a compartmental perfusion model to solve for perfusion values that best fit observed arterial and myocardial time activity curves.[4,5]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call