Pitfalls in HLA Ligandomics—How to Catch a Li(e)gand

Abstract

Knowledge about the peptide repertoire presented by human leukocyte antigens (HLA) holds the key to unlock target-specific cancer immunotherapies such as adoptive cell therapies or bispecific T cell engaging receptors. Therefore, comprehensive and accurate characterization of HLA peptidomes by mass spectrometry (immunopeptidomics) across tissues and disease states is essential. With growing numbers of immunopeptidomics datasets and the scope of peptide identification strategies reaching beyond the canonical proteome, the likelihood for erroneous peptide identification as well as false annotation of HLA-independent peptides as HLA ligands is increasing. Such “fake ligands” can lead to selection of nonexistent targets for immunotherapeutic development and need to be recognized as such as early as possible in the preclinical pipeline. Here we present computational and experimental methods that enable the identification of “fake ligands” that might be introduced at different steps of the immunopeptidomics workflow. The statistics presented herein allow discrimination of true HLA ligands from coisolated HLA-independent proteolytic fragments. In addition, we describe necessary steps to ensure system suitability of the chromatographic system. Furthermore, we illustrate an algorithm for detection of source fragmentation events that are introduced by electrospray ionization during mass spectrometry. For confirmation of peptide sequences, we present an experimental pipeline that enables high-throughput sequence verification through similarity of fragmentation pattern and coelution of synthetic isotope-labeled internal standards. Based on these methods, we show the overall high quality of existing datasets but point out limitations and pitfalls critical for individual peptides and how they can be uncovered in order to identify true ligands.