Piperacillin/tazobactam compared with ticarcillin/clavulanate in community-acquired bacterial lower respiratory tract infection.

Abstract

The efficacy and safety of a new combination parenteral antibiotic, piperacillin/tazobactam, was compared with that of parenteral ticarcillin/clavulanate in the treatment of adult patients with community-acquired lower respiratory tract infections. A total of 299 patients were enrolled in this multicentre, double-blind, comparative study; 177 received piperacillin/tazobactam and 122 received ticarcillin/clavulanate. Of these, 119 met the evaluability criteria (69, piperacillin/tazobactam and 50, ticarcillin/clavulanate). The study drugs (piperacillin/tazobactam 3 g/375 mg or ticarcillin/clavulanate 3 g/100 mg) were given every 6 h by slow iv infusion for a minimum of 5 days. The favourable clinical response (cured and improved) rates of evaluable patients were 84% and 64% at endpoint (P < 0.01) for piperacillin/tazobactam and ticarcillin/clavulanate, respectively. The favourable bacteriological response at the early follow-up (eradicated and presumed eradicated) were 91% and 67% for piperacillin/tazobactam and ticarcillin/clavulanate, respectively (P < 0.01). At endpoint, 84% and 64%, respectively (P = 0.02) had a favourable response. The most common adverse experiences involved the gastrointestinal tract and occurred in 31.6% of the piperacillin/tazobactam group compared with 20.5% in the ticarcillin/clavulanate group (P = 0.02). These events were mild and generally did not affect therapy. Piperacillin/tazobactam appears to be more effective than ticarcillin/clavulanate in this patient population and is generally well tolerated.