Abstract
Homology is perhaps the most central concept of phylogenetic biology. At difficult to resolve polytomies that are deep in the Tree of Life, a few homology errors in phylogenomic data can drive spurious phylogenetic results. Feijoo and Parada (2017) assembled three phylogenomic data sets for mammals and reported methodological discrepancies and unexpected results that contradict the monophyly of well-established clades in Pinnipedia and Yangochiroptera. Examination of Feijoo and Parada's (2017) data sets reveals extensive homology errors (paralogous sequences, alignments of different exons to each other) and cross-contamination of sequences from different species. These problems predictably result in distorted estimates of gene trees, species trees, bootstrap support, and branch lengths. Correction of these errors resulted in robust support for conventional relationships in Pinnipedia and Yangochiroptera. Phylogenomic data sets are not immune to the problems of homology errors in sequence alignments. Rather, sequence alignments underlie all inferences in molecular phylogenetics and evolution and should be spot-checked for obvious errors via manual inspection of alignments and gene trees.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
