Piloting a simplified bio-behavioural survey methodology, the BBS-Lite, among people who inject drugs in Georgia

Abstract

BackgroundDuring 2021 and 2023 two simplified Biological and Behavioural Study (BBS-Lite) surveys, and in 2022 one Standard Integrated Biological and Behavioural Study (IBBS), were conducted among people who inject drugs in seven cities in Georgia. From these, an opportunity to compare the implementation of these survey methods and results was able to be gained. MethodsThe two survey types were compared to find points of similarity and difference in their methodologies. The methodologies of the IBBS and BBS-Lite studies shared many characteristics, including the cities where they were implemented, recruitment criteria, sample sizes, and common questionnaire items. All studies were multi-centre cross-sectional involving administration of a face-to-face behavioural questionnaire and collection of biological specimens for testing of HIV, syphilis, hepatitis B virus (HBV), and hepatitis C virus (HCV). The main differences were in the sampling methods. The IBBS utilised respondent-driven sampling (RDS) while participants of the BBS-Lite studies were enrolled through consecutive recruitment at the harm reduction (HR) programme sites and on outreach and through snowball sampling. We compared the results from each study as well as the implementation modalities modalities such as time taken and budgetary requirements, and the complexity of implementation. ResultsConsiderably less time was required for recruitment, as well as for interviewing, data entry (4 times less) and the analysis for the BSS-Lite studies compared to the IBBS. The BSS-Lite study budgets were at least 2.5 times less than of the IBBS study.The recruited samples were comparable for age distribution, median age at first injection, the last drug injected, sharing of drug injecting equipment or receiving opioid agonist maintenance treatment (OAMT) during the last 12 months. HIV and HCV prevalence were similar including for stratifications by age, client status and city of recruitment. ConclusionOur findings have demonstrated that if implemented on a regular basis, the BBS-Lite can be a complementary solution for systematic data collection, filling surveillance gaps and addressing the challenges that persist in obtaining important data on people who inject drugs (PWID) between IBBS rounds in the country. The methodology is recommended for testing in other settings and in other key populations. In addition, the data collected on a routine base can help the harm reduction (HR) program to better understand the changes in the drug scene and observe new trends in HIV risks and drug injecting behaviours, possible barriers for access to harm reduction, drug treatment, and HIV and/or viral hepatitis testing and treatment services.