Abstract
Background: In the sports environment, the opinion that the leadership style of the coach plays an essential role in achieving team success is generally accepted (Amorose & Horn, 2001). Scott Martin and Kelly Barnes in 1999 created Coaching Behavior Assessment Questionnaire, based on CBAS (Smith et al., 1977) and LSS (Chelladurai & Saleh, 1978, 1980). Currently in the Czech Republic, there is no diagnostic tool that would address the effectiveness of the coach. Objective: The purpose of this pilot study was to translate and evaluate the structure of CBAQ by method of structural equation modeling for population of children in age 10 - 16. Methods: For translation of the questionnaire we utilized a modified direct translation method (Behling & Law, 2000). A total of 100 participants age 10 to 16, female 63 (mean age 13.02, SD = 2.10), male 37 (mean age 13.27, SD = 1.37) completed the CBAQ. For data analysis we applied both exploratory and confirmation factor analysis approaches. Results: The original model was tested to verify the structural theory and diagnosis quality of this tool. Results of the original CBAQ 12-factor model showed poor fit of the underaverage values RMSEA on the level 0.082, CFI on the level 0.600 and lack coefficients of generic reliability. After reanalyzing the data we established a modified 5-factor structure of CBAQ. This 5-factor model with restricted numbers of items gave the best values of fit RMSEA = 0.056, CFI = 0.964 and acceptable values of generic reliability. Conclusions: This study had pilot character and we were aware of problems with loosing information due to very restricted numbers of items in modified version, however it is suggested that final 5-factor version with 15 items could made basis for future full standardized Czech version of CBAQ.
Highlights
In the sports environment, the opinion that the leadership style of the coach plays an essential role in achieving team success is generally accepted (Amorose & Horn, 2001).Over the last few decades different research projects were held in order to identify factors that influence the effectiveness of the coach (e.g. Chelladurai & Saleh, 1978; Mondello & Janelle, 2001; Smith, Smoll, & Hunt, 1977)
Smith et al created the Coaching Behavior Assessment System (CBAS; Smith et al, 1977), which evaluates the coachs behavior based on participative structured observations
Comparing our results with data provided by authors of CBAQ there are a lot of differences
Summary
The opinion that the leadership style of the coach plays an essential role in achieving team success is generally accepted (Amorose & Horn, 2001).Over the last few decades different research projects were held in order to identify factors that influence the effectiveness of the coach (leader) (e.g. Chelladurai & Saleh, 1978; Mondello & Janelle, 2001; Smith, Smoll, & Hunt, 1977). The best known diagnostic tools in this area are Meditational model of leadership that was created by the authors Smith, Smoll, and Hunt (1978) and Multidimensional model of leadership, Chelladurai and Saleh (1978). These two models are generally accepted by experts, each of them has a fundamentally different approach in the evaluation of the work of coaches. Scott Martin and Kelly Barnes in 1999 created Coaching Behavior Assessment Questionnaire, based on CBAS (Smith et al, 1977) and LSS (Chelladurai & Saleh, 1978, 1980).
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
