Abstract

BackgroundThis paper proposes and pilots a repeated random sampling method to promote the likelihood of collecting drinking data equally representative of the behavior of university students at all times through the academic year.MethodsFrom October, 2016, to May, 2017, random samples of 1350 students were selected from the 39,155 undergraduate students enrolled in the fall semester at University of Houston. These students were sent an email inviting them to complete an online survey (entered into a weekly draw for a $50 gift certificate if responded).ResultsThe response rate was low (6%). Among participants who reported drinking in the last week, there was a variation as expected in the amount of drinking observed depending on the time of year (e.g., during exams).ConclusionsWhile the sampling methods show promise, procedures would need to be implemented to substantially increase response rates before the proposed methods could be seen as an advantage over existing survey sampling procedures.

Highlights

  • This paper proposes and pilots a repeated random sampling method to promote the likelihood of collecting drinking data representative of the behavior of university students at all times through the academic year

  • While some surveys employ sampling methodology that allow for the assessment of variations in consumption at different times during the year [8], the majority of surveys have not focused on time-specific issues relevant to alcohol consumption, such as season, or specific calendar-related heavy drinking events

  • Random samples of 1305 potential participants were selected weekly and were sent a link asking them to participate in a student life survey

Read more

Summary

Introduction

This paper proposes and pilots a repeated random sampling method to promote the likelihood of collecting drinking data representative of the behavior of university students at all times through the academic year. When epidemiological survey data has been used to track calendar-specific variations in drinking (e.g., Christmas or New Year) [9], the results, while indicative of variations in consumption, suffer from the limitation that the survey sampling methodology does not allow for confidence regarding whether the drinking data produced is representative on each calendar date. This is because the survey sampling frame was generated at one (or, at most, several time-points) and attempts were made to contact participants over an extended period of time. It is important to note that, as calendar-related heavy drinking is not the purpose of these surveys, the lack of information on this topic in these surveys is not a weakness—just a fact relating to the differing purpose associated with their data collection

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.