Abstract

ObjectivesThe aim of this in-vitro pilot study was to establish a splint testing method and compare insertion/removal performance of dental splints. Materials and methods56 identical lower jaw splints (n = 8 per group) were manufactured from 2x methacrylate (MA) hand-cast (reference material), deep-drawn Polyethyleneterephthalate, combined deep-draw MA hand-cast, 2x CAD/CAM-milled MA and 3D-printed MA systems. After 10 days water storage (37 °C), cyclic pull-off and insertion performance on a metal jaw was investigated. Statistics; Shapiro-Wilk-test, one-way-ANOVA; post-hoc-Bonferroni, Kaplan-Meier-survival, α = 0.05. ResultsMean insertion/pull-off cycles varied significantly (p = 0.000) between 864 cycles (MA) and 202640 cycles (Deep Draw MA). Fracture of the splints was characterized by brittle individual fractures in the 31–34 region and most fractures in region 35 (44 of 56 splints). Finite element analysis confirmed the type and location of failure. ConclusionsDeep-draw, cast methacrylate and combined systems showed longer insertion/pull-off system cycles in comparison to printed or milled splints. Insertion/pull-off performance showed differences between the tested splint systems and indicates the influence of the processing. Clinical relevanceThe presented in-vitro test allowed for estimating the clinical insertion/pull-off performance of dental splints.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.