Abstract

One facet of the proposed restructuring of the National Airspace System currently generating much interest is called ‘Free Flight’. At the heart of the Free Flight system is an increased flexibility in pilot decision making and responsibility for the definition and maintenance of separation, of preferred routes and speeds, and the conduct of maneuvers in response to potential conflicts and other emergencies in the airspace. Here, we describe a simulation experiment where fifteen commercial pilots were presented with traffic conflict situations in the en route environment. Within the scenarios we manipulated density, type of conflict, and relative bearing of conflict aircraft. Pilots were required to navigate a simulated 757 aircraft to destination airport, avoiding all possible traffic conflicts. Their ability to maintain separation was the principle dependent measure. Results indicated that density and bearing did not appear to have any substantive effect on pilot response. However, overtaking conflicts produced a higher frequency of operational errors than crossing or converging conflicts. Further analysis of individual pilot responses revealed different strategies. Analysis of individual overtaking scenarios revealed patterns of pilot action associated with efficient and often creative conflict resolutions. An example of an inefficient conflict resolution was also identified.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.