Abstract
Medicare and many commercial insurers have published medical policies detailing the medical necessity of penile prosthesis (PP) for erectile dysfunction (ED). Despite the widely acknowledged medical necessity, many employers have a specific benefit exclusion for PP, which creates a barrier among men enrolled in employer-sponsored health (ESH) plans. This study explored key stakeholder perceptions of the benefit exclusion for PP in ESH plans.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
