Abstract

Two experiments examined memory for event duration in pigeons using choice and successive matching tasks. In the choice task, two stimuli were presented following the sample, and the correct choice depended upon the duration of the preceding sample. In the successive task, only one of two stimuli was presented following the sample, and whether responding was or was not reinforced depended upon the duration of the preceding sample. In the first experiment, a successive matching task was employed and accuracy decreased at an equivalent rate as a function of delay on short-sample and long-sample trials, regardless of whether the events which differed in duration were samples of houselight or food. The second experiment, which employed as samples different durations of houselight, replicated this result both in naive subjects and in subjects previously trained in a choice matching task. In addition, it was found that naive subjects which were trained and tested in a choice matching task demonstrated a more rapid decrease in accuracy on long-sample trials than on short-sample trials as a function of delay; a result which has been obtained in several previous studies and has been referred to as the “choose-short” effect. It was also found, however, that the choose-short effect did not occur in the choice matching task if subjects had been trained and tested previously in the successive matching task. It was concluded that pigeons employ different coding strategies in matching to sample duration in the choice and successive tasks.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call