Abstract
The paper deals with the sociology of literature of Pierre Bourdieu, one of the most influential figures in contemporary sociology of art. Initially, Bourdieu intended to overcome dichotomy of formalistic and contextual approaches, to transcend both the subjectivism and objectivism and to situate culture within broader social context and power relations. The sociologist suggested a systematic approach to literary practise and elaborated a theory of fields, the key terms of which are field, habitus, economic, social, cultural and symbolic capital, struggles, stake, structural homology, positions, dispositions, domination, strategy etc. The specificity of the literary field is defined mostly by the concepts of relative autonomy and “reversed” economy. Bourdieu examines the social positions of individuals and institutions involved in making cultural products (writers, publishers, critics, readers etc.), the social conditions, circulation and consumption of literary works. In this conceptual framework, literary text gains a specific status as the independent object of analysis (even such literary features as genre, narrative devices, types of characters etc. have special social meaning and function), what distinguishes Bourdieu from many his predecessors. His practical researches bring together various methods and combine empirical analysis with a strong theoretical frame. Numerous contemporary projects of sociology of culture are based on Bourdieu’s ideas. Some issues, however, have been brought for discussion, especially the universality of the notions and the concept of autonomy. Bourdieu constructed a powerful, highly theoretically structured model for interpretation of literature. It integrates every element of culture and provides tools for revealing their complex dialectical relations. Bourdieu’s sociology of literature might be a beneficial mode of analysis for Lithuanian literary scholars.
Highlights
The paper deals with the sociology of literature of Pierre Bourdieu, one of the most influential figures in contemporary sociology of art
The sociologist suggested a systematic approach to literary practise and elaborated a theory of fields, the key terms of which are field, habitus, economic, social, cultural and symbolic capital, struggles, stake, structural homology, positions, dispositions, domination, strategy etc
Literary text gains a specific status as the independent object of analysis, what distinguishes Bourdieu from many his predecessors
Summary
Prieð deðimtá metø kultûros sociologë Wendy Griswold ironizavo, kad literatûros sociologija panaði veikiau á graþiø, taèiau chaotiðkai auganèiø gëliø pievà nei á organizuotà moksliniø tyrimø ir diskusijø laukà: esama áspûdingø teoriniø prielaidø, stebinanèiø áþvalgø ir iðsamiø praktiniø darbø, bet stinga dalykiniø jungèiø[1 ]. Kavolio tyrinëjimai kartu yra aiðkus pavyzdys, kaip smarkiai lietuviø literatûros sociologija pasikliauja groþiniais tekstais – bûtent jie pasirenkami kaip pagrindinë analizës medþiaga, o socialiniams faktams, veiksmams ir diskursams skiriama maþiau dëmesio. Literatûros sociologijos teorijà ir praktikà atnaujino prancûzø sociologas Pierre’as Bourdieu (1930–2002), kuris padarë didþiulæ átakà. Lietuvos menotyrininkai irgi yra pradëjæ aptarinëti Bourdieu idëjas – pavyzdþiui, Þilvinë Gaiþutytë nagrinëjo percepcijos problemà[8], Skaidra Trilupaitytë bendriausiais bruoþais pristatë Bourdieu kultûros sociologijà[9], Odeta Þukauskienë jà aptarë prancûzø meno sociologijos kontekste[10]. Lietuviø literatûrologø darbuose taip pat atsiranda nuorodø á Bourdieu teorines áþvalgas ar praktiniø darbø iðvadas. Todël literatûrologø auditorijoje atrodo aktualu aptarti Pierre’o Bourdieu plëtotà literatûros sociologijos variantà, detaliau pristatyti jo pasiûlytà teorijà ir metodologijà, pasvarstyti literatûros studijoms atveriamas galimybes
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.