Abstract

Land, surface waters, and ground water worldwide, are increasingly affected by contaminations from industrial, research experiments, military, and agricultural activities either due to ignorance, lack of vision, carelessness, or high cost of waste disposal and treatment. The rapid build-up of toxic pollutants (metals, radionuclide, and organic contaminants in soil, surface water, and ground water) not only affects natural resources, but also causes major strains on ecosystems. Interest in phytoremediation as a method to solve environmental contamination has been growing rapidly in recent years. This green technology that involved “tolerant plants” has been utilized to clean up soil and ground water from heavy metals and other toxic organic compounds. Phytoremediation involves growing plants in a contaminated matrix to remove environmental contaminants by facilitating sequestration and/or degradation (detoxification) of the pollutants. Plants are unique organisms equipped with remarkable metabolic and absorption capabilities, as well as transport systems that can take up nutrients or contaminants selectively from the growth matrix, soil or water. As extensive as these benefits are, the costs of using plants along with other concerns like climatic restrictions that may limit growing of plants and slow speed in comparison with conventional methods (i.e., physical and chemical treatment) for bioremediation must be considered carefully. While the benefits of using phytoremediation to restore balance to a stressed environment seem to far outweigh the cost, the largest barrier to the advancement of phytoremediation could be the public opposition. The long-term implication of green plant technology in removing or sequestering environmental contaminations must be addressed thoroughly. As with all new technology, it is important to proceed with caution.

Highlights

  • The success of green technology in phytoremediation, in general, is dependent upon several factors

  • Letachowicz et al [25] conducted a study on the phytoremediation capacity on heavy metals accumulation in different organs of Typhia latifolia L

  • The Typhia latifolia species that can absorb heavy metals can be used as bio-indicator of pollutants is a macrohydrophyte and is widely present in the entire lowland and lower mountain sites

Read more

Summary

Green Technology

The success of green technology in phytoremediation, in general, is dependent upon several factors. It is preferable to have the metal accumulated in the shoots as opposed to the roots, for metal in the shoot can be cut from the plant and removed. This is manageable on a small scale, but impractical on a large scale. If the metals are concentrated in the roots, the entire plant needs to be removed. The availability of metals in the soil for plant uptake is another limitation for successful phytoremediation. Lead is known to be “molecularly sticky” since it readily forms a precipitate within the soil matrix It has low aqueous solubility, and, in many cases, is not readily bioavailable. It is believed that these plants initially develop the ability to hyperaccumulate non-essential metallic compounds as a means of protecting themselves from herbivorous predators that would experience serious toxic side effects from ingestion of the hyperaccumulator’s foliage [3]

Plants as Phytoremediators
Grasses as Potential Phytoremediators
Phytoremediation as a Cleansing Tool
Phytoremediation of Water Pollutants
Phytoremediation Species in Coastal Water
Phytoremediation of Soil Pollutants
Phytoremediation of Lead Contaminated Soils
Phytoremediation Potential of Some Plant Species from Mining Sites
Phytoremediation Potential of Selected Plants for Mutagenic Agents
Phytoremediation Potential of Selected Tropical Plants for Acrylamide
Findings
Outlook
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call