Abstract

ABSTRACT The distribution of physiological daily inhalation rates for pregnant and lactating females aged 11 to 55 years was determined according to total daily energy expenditures, energy costs for growth, pregnancy and lactation (maternal milk-energy synthesis and breast-energy output) in free-living females. Such published data were obtained using a methodology based on the disappearance rates of predetermined doses of doubly labeled water (2H2O and H2 18O) in urine from non-pregnant and non-lactating females (n = 357), as well as saliva from gravid and breastfeeding females (n = 91), monitored by gas-isotope-ratio mass spectrometry over an aggregate period of about 6,000 days. Monte Carlo simulations were necessary to integrate total daily energy requirements of non-pregnant and non-lactating females into energy costs and weight changes at the 9th, 22nd, and 36th week of pregnancy and at the 6th and 27th, postpartum week: 540,000 data were simulated. The present article confirms that physiological daily inhalation rates for under-, normal-, and overweight/obese pregnant and lactating females expressed in m3/day and m3/kg-day are higher than those for males. For instance, in normal-weight subjects, inhalation rates are higher by 18 to 41% throughout pregnancy and 23 to 39% during postpartum weeks: actual values were higher in females by 1.13 to 2.01 m3/day at the 9th week of pregnancy, 3.74 to 4.53 m3/day at the 22nd week and 4.41 to 5.20 m3/day at the 36th week, and by 4.43 to 5.30 m3/day at the 6th postpartum week and 4.22 to 5.11 m3/day at the 27th postpartum week. The highest 99th percentiles were found to be 0.622 m3/kg-day in pregnant females and 0.647 m3/kg-day in lactating females. By comparison, the highest 99th percentile value for individuals aged 2.6 months to 96 years was determined to be 0.725 m3/kg-day in Brochu et al. (2006a). Air quality criteria and standard calculations based on the latter value for non-carcinogenic toxic compounds should therefore be protective for virtually all pregnant and lactating females. The present article highlights evidence that the current default assumption regarding the total daily air intake used by the Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) to derive human equivalent concentrations in reference dose calculations is also underestimated compared to some higher 75th and 90th percentiles of physiological daily inhalation rates in pregnant and lactating females.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call