Physiological and Transcriptomic Analyses of the Effects of SlBRI1 Expression Levels on the Drought Tolerance of Tomato Seedlings

Abstract

Brassinosteroids (BRs) not only influence plant growth and development but also regulate various stress responses in plants. BRASSINOSTEROID INSENSITIVE 1 (BRI1) acts as a BR receptor, sensing BRs and then activating BR signalling. In this study, we researched how SlBRI1 regulates the drought tolerance of tomato at both the physiological and transcriptomic levels. We used SlBRI1-overexpressing and SlBRI1-weak mutant (abs) plants that were of the same background to research the mechanism underlying their drought tolerance. Physiological analyses revealed that, compared with Money Maker (MM) plants, abs plants had a greater net photosynthesis rate (Pn) and less wilting, and abs plants also accumulated lower amounts of peroxide (H2O2) and superoxide (O2−) through increased antioxidant enzyme activities under drought conditions. RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) analysis showed that the expression of 1425 and 840 genes was induced and repressed in response to drought in MM plants, respectively. However, the expression of 768 (53.9%) of drought induced 1425 genes and 418 (49.8%) of drought repressed 840 genes was induced and repressed, respectively, in abs plants under normal conditions. Moreover, the expression of 158 genes whose expression was induced in response to drought and 43 genes whose expression was repressed in response to drought was further upregulated and downregulated, respectively, in abs plants under drought conditions. In-depth analysis of these differentially expressed genes (DEGs) revealed that the expression of genes related to abscisic acid (ABA) metabolism and polyamine biosynthesis as well as oxidoreductase activity was upregulated in abs under both normal and drought conditions. Furthermore, analysis of transcription factor (TF) expression suggested that the drought tolerance of abs differed mainly through the regulation of WRKY, ERF, bHLH and MYB TFs. However, the expression of most of these genes was the same or opposite in the SlBRI1OE plants compared with the MM plants. Our results affirm that SlBRI1 expression is negatively involved in the drought response of tomato. Furthermore, our study provides valuable information for future breeding to appropriately reduce the expression of SlBRI1 and improve drought tolerance without affecting plant growth.