Abstract

Abstract. Despite the importance of vegetation uptake of atmospheric gaseous elemental mercury (Hg(0)) within the global Hg cycle, little knowledge exists on the physiological, climatic, and geographic factors controlling stomatal uptake of atmospheric Hg(0) by tree foliage. We investigate controls on foliar stomatal Hg(0) uptake by combining Hg measurements of 3569 foliage samples across Europe with data on tree species' traits and environmental conditions. To account for foliar Hg accumulation over time, we normalized foliar Hg concentration over the foliar life period from the simulated start of the growing season to sample harvest. The most relevant parameter impacting daily foliar stomatal Hg uptake was tree functional group (deciduous versus coniferous trees). On average, we measured 3.2 times higher daily foliar stomatal Hg uptake rates in deciduous leaves than in coniferous needles of the same age. Across tree species, for foliage of beech and fir, and at two out of three forest plots with more than 20 samples, we found a significant (p<0.001) increase in foliar Hg values with respective leaf nitrogen concentrations. We therefore suggest that foliar stomatal Hg uptake is controlled by tree functional traits with uptake rates increasing from low to high nutrient content representing low to high physiological activity. For pine and spruce needles, we detected a significant linear decrease in daily foliar stomatal Hg uptake with the proportion of time during which water vapor pressure deficit (VPD) exceeded the species-specific threshold values of 1.2 and 3 kPa, respectively. The proportion of time within the growing season during which surface soil water content (ERA5-Land) in the region of forest plots was low correlated negatively with foliar Hg uptake rates of beech and pine. These findings suggest that stomatal uptake of atmospheric Hg(0) is inhibited under high VPD conditions and/or low soil water content due to the regulation of stomatal conductance to reduce water loss under dry conditions. Other parameters associated with forest sampling sites (latitude and altitude), sampled trees (average age and diameter at breast height), or regional satellite-observation-based transpiration product (Global Land Evaporation Amsterdam Model: GLEAM) did not significantly correlate with daily foliar Hg uptake rates. We conclude that tree physiological activity and stomatal response to VPD and soil water content should be implemented in a stomatal Hg model to assess future Hg cycling under different anthropogenic emission scenarios and global warming.

Highlights

  • Mercury (Hg) is a toxic pollutant that is emitted by anthropogenic and geogenic activities into the atmosphere, where it can be transported over large distances and is eventually transferred to terrestrial and ocean surfaces by dry or wet deposition (Bishop et al, 2020)

  • To make Hg levels in foliage sampled at different times comparable, we calculated daily foliar Hg uptake rates by normalizing foliar Hg concentrations with the life period of samples

  • We observed that foliar Hg concentrations were highly correlated with foliage sampling date (Fig. 2), confirming the notion that foliage takes up Hg(0) over the entire growing season and over multiple growing seasons in the case of coniferous needles (Fig. 7)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Mercury (Hg) is a toxic pollutant that is emitted by anthropogenic and geogenic activities into the atmosphere, where it can be transported over large distances and is eventually transferred to terrestrial and ocean surfaces by dry or wet deposition (Bishop et al, 2020). For more than 2 decades, vegetation has been recognized as an important vector for Hg(0) dry deposition within the terrestrial Hg cycle (Rea et al, 1996, 2002; Grigal, 2003). Based on this seminal work, researchers have since highlighted that vegetation impacts Hg levels of all other environmental compartments within the active Hg cycle (AMAP and UNEP, 2019; Bishop et al, 2020; Zhou et al, 2021). Mercury sequestered by forest ecosystems accumulates in soil and may subsequently be transported from watersheds to streams, rivers, and the ocean, where it can bioaccumulate in fish (Drenner et al, 2013; Jiskra et al, 2017; Sonke et al, 2018)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call