Abstract

In social science, we seek to understand human decisions in terms of social-psychological primitives: a decision maker or conscious self, aware of its opportunity sets, resource constraints, preferences, and somewhat contentiously, endowed with at least a spoonful of free will. Tired of swimming and reluctant to brave cold rapids, one decides to devise a bridge of logs. Without the self-conscious and the associated free will, this concept of decision would need some as yet unknown redefinition. Physics and biology face no such challenge. A rock rolling down the hillside does not decide to crush the car when their paths cross, and a peacock does not choose its beautiful feathers to attract a mate. A general optimizing principle — minimizing action subject to constraints — is sufficient to organize our understanding of such phenomena without resorting to self-consciousness, preferences, or free will. Between the two approaches — the laws-of-nature in natural science and conscious decision-making in social science, we do not have to choose one or the other to model and understand human behavior. We suggest, instead, a syncretic method to gain an understanding of human behavior in three tiers, best exemplified in physics, biology, and social sciences respectively. This note outlines our proposal, explained in more details elsewhere1.

Highlights

  • Physics and biology face no such challenge

  • Between the two approaches—the laws-of-nature in natural science and conscious decision-making in social science, we do not have to choose one or the other to model and understand human behavior

  • Instead, a syncretic method to gain an understanding of human behavior in three tiers, best exemplified in physics, biology, and social sciences respectively

Read more

Summary

Physical corpora are subject to physical laws

A physical corpus is a common attribute of inanimate objects, animals, and humans, all subject to universal physical laws. We propose using this principle to isolate the elements of all forms of action—human, animal, or inanimate—that arises from the physical corpus involved; for inanimate, we need to proceed no further, and explanation of the remainder for animals can be sought in their biology, and for humans in their biology and higher social-psychological faculties. Proposition Of all possible paths from a beginning point A to an end point B, the materially efficient path uses minimal action, where action is a scalar that corresponds to the dimension in which (appropriately defined) value has been conserved

Inverting the order of deployment of rules
Using the principle of least action to frame animate and inanimate actions
Traveling from A to B in Euclidian 2-D space
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.