Abstract

In spite of the fact that dissolution time profiles of 250mg ursodeoxycholic acid (UCDA) capsules developed by Sponsor and 250mg hard capsules produced by Ursofalk®, Dr. Falk Pharma GmbH, indicated similarity (f2=60.6), a bioavailability study indicated unexpected differences in the formulations. To find an explanation of the in vivo performance of the compared formulations, the dissolution profiles were analyzed using a novel dissolution theory considering:•constant diffusion layer thickness,•particle size dependent solubility of UDCA,•disintegration (opening) of the finish dosage form.The dissolution model was applied to the measured data using SADAPT. Despite Cmax and AUC values showing higher values after administration of the test product, a reduction of UDCA particle size for the test formulation was suggested for reformulation. The decision was based on the strongly pH-dependent UDCA solubility, formation of insoluble crystals at low pH condition and the known high pH fluctuations ranging from pH1 to 8 in empty stomach.The performed reformulation led to increased dissolution rate of the test product and to a positive bioequivalence study which compared the reformulated test generic formulation with two reference products purchased from two highly regulated markets.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call