Abstract
The potato starch extracted by physical, chemical, and enzymatic methods were analyzed for physicochemical, morphological, functional, and pasting properties. In the physical extraction methods, T1 (water at 30 °C) was found better in starch yield, water absorption capacity (WAC), and whiteness. In the chemical extraction methods, starch from T5 (NaOH-0.25%) had higher WAC, and lower ash content. The starch from T7 (SDS-ME-2%) had higher amylose, starch purity, and lower amylopectin, moisture, fat content. The starch from T11 (NaOCl-5.25%) had higher starch whiteness value. In the enzymatic extraction methods, starch from T13 (cellulase-0.15%) had higher starch yield. Further, the physical (T1), chemical (T5, T7 and T11) and enzymatic (T13) methods were used in combination and had shown the better physicochemical and morphological characteristics of starch. The starch from combined method (T14) had significantly higher yield (12.4%), WAC (259%), swelling power (40.3%), solubility (23.6%), purity (87.3%), and whiteness (95.2%). The starch from combined method also had significantly lower phosphorus (81.7%), protein (0.30%), fat (0.29%), ash (0.26%), crude fiber (0.15%) content, and syneresis (18.8%). The starch from combined method had resulted in the better starch granule structure, pasting properties than most of the other treatments. So, the physical, chemical, and enzymatic treatments in combination can be used for extraction of high-quality starch from potato.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.