Abstract

The effect of pin-milling and turbo-milling on particle size distribution and geometric mean diameter of chickpea flour was determined. The form factor and starch granule diameter of both samples were also calculated. Both samples were divided into six granulometric fractions with a sieving classifier using a range of mesh opening from 44 to 425 µm, which include five sieves and one pan. The starch and protein contents of the initially obtained flour and each fraction were determined. A major proportion of particles of both samples had a geometric mean diameter of 326 µm. Pin-milled flour had a geometric mean diameter of 270.7 µm at a moisture content of 8.29% (w.b.). Turbo-milled flour had a geometric mean diameter of 268.5 µm at 8.52% (w.b.) moisture content. There was no significant difference between pin-milled and turbo-milled flours in terms of geometric mean diameter of particles and average diameter of starch granules. There was no considerable difference between the starch granule size of the six fractions and the initially obtained flour of both samples. The averages of form factor and starch granule diameters in pin-milled and turbo-milled flours were determined using scanning electron microscope (SEM) images and Matrox Inspector software. The average form factor and starch granules diameters in pin-milled flour were 0.77 and 15.78 µm, respectively, while those of turbo-milled flour were 0.69 and 15.70 µm, respectively.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.