Abstract

BackgroundThe relationship of bidirectional sharing of information between physicians and patients to patient satisfaction with treatment decision-making for ulcerative colitis (UC) has not been examined. Here, we conducted a web-based survey to evaluate this relationship.MethodsPatients aged ≥ 20 years with UC were recruited from the IBD Patient Panel and Japanese IBD Patient Association. Patients completed our web-based survey between 11 May and 1 June 2020. The main outcomes were patient satisfaction (assessed by the Decision Regret Scale) and patient trust in physicians (assessed by the Trust in Physician Scale).ResultsIn this study (n = 457), a structural equation modelling analysis showed that physician-to-patient and patient-to-physician information significantly affected patient satisfaction with treatment decision-making (standardised path coefficient: 0.426 and 0.135, respectively) and patient trust in physicians (0.587 and 0.158, respectively). Notably, physician-to-patient information had a greater impact. For patient satisfaction with treatment decision-making and patient trust in physicians, information on “disease” (indirect effect: 0.342 and 0.471, respectively), “treatment” (0.335 and 0.461, respectively), and “endoscopy” (0.295 and 0.407, respectively) was particularly important, and the level of this information was adequate or almost adequate. Patient-to-physician information on “anxiety and distress” (0.116 and 0.136, respectively), “intention and desire for treatment” (0.113 and 0.132, respectively), and “future expectations of life” (0.104 and 0.121, respectively) were also important for patient satisfaction with treatment decision-making and patient trust in physicians, but these concerns were not adequately communicated.ConclusionsAdequate physician–patient communication, especially physician-to-patient information, enhanced patient satisfaction with treatment decision-making for UC.

Highlights

  • Ulcerative colitis (UC) is an inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) of unknown aetiology that primarily affects the mucosa of the large intestine and often results in mucosal erosions and ulcerations [1,2,3]

  • Background characteristics that correlated with Decision Regret Scale (DRS) or Trust in Physician Scale (TIPS) were PRO2 score, time spent with the physician when deciding on treatment, and patient decision-making preference scale (Table 2)

  • Patient-background characteristics that were significantly related to DRS and TIPS were current PRO2 remission/non-remission, time spent with the physician when deciding on treatment (\ 10 min/10 to \ 15 min/ C 15 min), and patient decision-making preference scale

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is an inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) of unknown aetiology that primarily affects the mucosa of the large intestine and often results in mucosal erosions and ulcerations [1,2,3]. As there is no cure for UC [2], physicians and patients face numerous treatment decisions during the clinical course of the disease. The relationship of bidirectional sharing of information between physicians and patients to patient satisfaction with treatment decision-making for ulcerative colitis (UC) has not been examined. DRS or TIPS (absolute correlation coefficient of C 0.2) were PRO2 score, time spent with the physician when deciding on treatment, and patient decision-making preference scale (Table 2). Patient-background characteristics that were significantly related to DRS and TIPS were current PRO2 remission/non-remission, time spent with the physician when deciding on treatment (\ 10 min/10 to \ 15 min/ C 15 min), and patient decision-making preference scale Sex Male, n (%) 172 (37.6) Female, n (%) 285 (62.4).

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call