Abstract

Background: Poor time in therapeutic range (TTR) control is associated with an increased risk of stroke and bleeding in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients receiving warfarin. This study aimed to determine whether the physician–pharmacist collaborative clinic (PPCC) model could improve the anticoagulation quality as well as to create a nomogram for predicting anticoagulation quality in AF patients. Methods: This retrospective observational study enrolled AF patients who either initially received warfarin or returned to warfarin after withdrawal between January 1, 2016 and January 1, 2021, at our institution. The primary outcome was dynamic changes in TTRs (a TTR of ≥60% considered high anticoagulation quality). The secondary outcomes were thromboembolic and bleeding events during follow-up. We compared the dynamic changes in TTRs between the general clinic (GC) and PPCC groups in both the original and propensity score matching (PSM) cohorts. In addition, we explored the potential predictors of high anticoagulation quality and subsequently formulated a nomogram to predict anticoagulation quality. Results: A total of 265 patients with AF were included, comprising 57 patients in the PPCC group and 208 patients in the GC group. During a median follow-up period of 203 days, the PPCC group had a shorter time (76 vs. 199 days, p < 0.001) and more patients achieved a TTR ≥60% (73.7 vs. 47.1%, p = 0.002 by log-rank test) than the GC group. The results from the PSM cohort confirmed this finding. No significant differences in the incidences of thromboembolic events (5.3 vs. 5.3%, p = 1.000) and bleeding events (4.3 vs. 3.5%, p = 1.000) were observed between the two groups. Four variables were explored as predictors related to high anticoagulation quality: treatment within a PPCC, history of bleeding, history of bleeding, and the presence of more than four comorbidities. The nomogram revealed a moderate predictive ability (c-index: 0.718, 95% confidence interval (95%CI): 0.669–0.767) and a moderately fitted calibration curve. Conclusion: The PPCC model contributed to improved anticoagulation quality in AF patients receiving warfarin. The nomogram might be an effective tool to predict anticoagulation quality and could aid physicians and pharmacists in the selection of patients who will likely benefit from sustained and active intervention.

Highlights

  • The incidence of atrial fibrillation (AF), the most common sustained arrhythmia (Ball et al, 2013), has increased by 33% during the past 20 years, resulting in 37,574 million cases worldwide by 2017 (Lippi et al, 2020)

  • The baseline characteristics were relatively comparable between the physician–pharmacist collaborative clinic (PPCC) and GC groups, except for age, certain comorbidities, and co-administered drugs (SMD >0.2 for each variable)

  • After propensity score matching (PSM), the baseline characteristics were wellbalanced (SMD 0.014 for age; standardized mean differences (SMD)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The incidence of atrial fibrillation (AF), the most common sustained arrhythmia (Ball et al, 2013), has increased by 33% during the past 20 years, resulting in 37,574 million cases worldwide by 2017 (Lippi et al, 2020). Previous studies have shown that the participation of clinical pharmacists could improve the TTR in AF patients receiving warfarin (An et al, 2017; Kose et al, 2018; Marcatto et al, 2018) These studies only focused on the relationship between pharmacists’ intervention and outcomes at a certain time point and did not explore the effect of the continuous intervention on the dynamic changes of TTRs. In addition, some studies have explored the risk factors associated with the anticoagulation quality of warfarin (Okumura et al, 2011; Pokorney et al, 2015; Mwita et al, 2018), but the results have not been extrapolated to clinical practice based on score systems. This study aimed to determine whether the physician–pharmacist collaborative clinic (PPCC) model could improve the anticoagulation quality as well as to create a nomogram for predicting anticoagulation quality in AF patients

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.