Abstract

Japanese physicians' attitudes regarding the health-care needs of young adult childhood cancer survivors (CCSs) are not well described. Thus, we examined the self-reported preferences and knowledge of pediatric oncologists and surgeons. A mailed survey was sent to 858 physician members of the Japanese Society of Pediatric Oncology. We compared the responses of pediatric oncologists and pediatric surgeons. The pediatric oncologists' response rate was 56% (300 out of 533) and that of pediatric surgeons 32% (105 out of 325). The median age of respondents was 46 and 48 years, respectively; 79 and 84% were men. When comfort levels in caring for CCSs were described (i.e. 1 = very uncomfortable; 7 = very comfortable), the mean levels were 4.4 and 3.8 with CCSs ≤ 21 years, 3.6 and 3.6 with 21 years < CCSs ≤ 30 years, and 2.8 and 3.3 with CCSs > 30 years, respectively. In clinical vignette questions, 62% of the pediatric oncologists and 43% of the surgeons answered three or more questions appropriately. Pediatric surgeons reported significantly lower familiarity with long-term follow-up guidelines than pediatric oncologists. Most pediatric oncologists and many surgeons conducted truth-telling of cancer diagnosis to adult CCSs now. They thought that the most important issues are an original long-term follow-up guideline suitable for the Japanese situation and collaborations with adult-based general physicians. Many Japanese pediatric oncologists are uncomfortable with caring for survivors as they age and have suboptimal knowledge regarding late effects. The change in truth-telling situation and preference for collaboration with adult-based physicians was demonstrated also in Japan.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call