Abstract
AbstractThe presented morphostructural segmentation of the Alps and Western Carpathians uses physically based geomorphometric variables as input data and object‐based image analysis as a procedure to delineate objects of interest. A previous suitability evaluation of simple object‐based methodology showed its potential in recognition of morphostructural features. When segmenting the Western Carpathians, we moved towards a more specific object‐based approach—a fusion of segmentation and classification at several hierarchical levels. Such an approach was evaluated as not necessary in the less contrasting terrain in the Alps, where only a simple segmentation was used for evaluation of its efficiency. Use of physically based geomorphometric variables as input data brought enhancement of subsequent morphotectonic interpretations. After the segmentations, an index of steady state (ISS) for the entire object levels and their parts was computed. This ISS was used to evaluate and compare the two study areas in terms of their geodynamic development. Similarities and differences in development of these relatively alike mountain ranges are interpreted.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.