Abstract

The current paper discusses the physically correct evaluation of the driving force for fatigue crack propagation in elastic–plastic materials using the $$J$$ -integral concept. This is important for low-cycle fatigue and for short fatigue cracks, where the conventional stress intensity range ( $$\Delta K$$ ) concept cannot be applied. Using the configurational force concept, Simha et al. (J Mech Phys Solids 56:2876–2895, 2008) , have derived the $$J$$ -integral for elastic–plastic materials with incremental theory of plasticity, $$J^{\mathrm{ep}}$$ , which is applicable for cyclic loading and/or for growing cracks, in contrast to the conventional $$J$$ -integral. The variation of this incremental plasticity $$J$$ -integral $$J^{\mathrm{ep}}$$ is studied in numerical investigations conducted on two-dimensional C(T)-specimens with long cracks under cyclic Mode I loading. The crack propagates by an increment after each load cycle. The maximum load is varied so that small- and large-scale yielding conditions prevail. Three different load ratios are considered, from pure tension to tension-compression loading. By theoretical considerations and comparisons with the variation of the crack tip opening displacement $$\delta _{\mathrm{t}}$$ , it is demonstrated that the cyclic, incremental plasticity $$J$$ -integral $$\Delta J_{\mathrm{actPZ}}^{\mathrm{ep}}$$ , which is computed for a contour around the active plastic zone of the growing crack, is physically appropriate to characterize the growth rate of fatigue cracks. The validity of the experimental cyclic $$J$$ -integral, $$\Delta J^{\mathrm{exp}}$$ , proposed by Dowling and Begley (ASTM STP 590:82–103, 1976), is also investigated. The results show that $$\Delta J^{\mathrm{exp}}$$ is correct for the first load cycle, however, not fully appropriate for a growing fatigue crack.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call