Abstract

The purposes of this study were threefold. The first aim was to test the reliability and validity of a Portuguese version of the Physical Self-Perception Profile (PSPPp) in elite basketball players and determine its sensitivity to assess Self-perceptions in athletes with and without physical disabilities. The second aim was to assess the relationship between variables such as length of sport career, frequency of doing sport and competitive level, and Self-perceptions in the physical domain as well as Global Self-esteem both in athletes with and without disability. The third aim was to assess the relationship between disability-specific variables such as lesion source, type of lesion, time onset of disability and functional classification, and Self-perceptions in the physical domain as well as Global Self-esteem in athletes with disability. The psychometric properties and validity of the PSPPp were evaluated with a sample basketball players with (n = 64) and without disability (n = 69). Cronbach alpha values for subscales ranged from .66 to .79 for the disability group and from.62 to .73 for the group without disability. Exploratory factor analysis revealed a different factorial organization to that reported with the original instrument. The hierarchical organisation of the PSPPp subscales was partially supported by correlation and partial correlation analyses especially in basketball players without disability.

Highlights

  • Self-esteem has been widely accepted as an important indicator of emotional stability, adjustment to life demands and mental health

  • A general view of the results would initially suggest that the Portuguese version of the PSPP has showed limited validity for the assessment of Portuguese wheelchair sport athlete’s self-perceptions in the Physical domain

  • The differences seen in relationships among the constructs between groups with and without disability has provided some insight into the sources of differences in content recorded

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Self-esteem has been widely accepted as an important indicator of emotional stability, adjustment to life demands and mental health. The assessment of Physical Self-perceptions has becoming more sophisticated in the past 15 years reflecting multidimensionality and hierarchical organisation (Marsh, 1997) as well as the development of instruments in line with theoretical frameworks (Fox, 1998) such as the Physical Self Perception Profile – PSPP (Fox & Corbin, 1989) and the Physical Self Description Questionnaire – PSDQ (Marsh, Richards, Johnson, Roche, & Tremayne, 1994) This new generation of instrumentation has rarely been applied to populations with disability in most of the European countries

Objectives
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.