Abstract
This study was made to determine the effects of genotype and housing system on physical quality characteristics of breast and leg meat of broilers under experimental conditions. The 150 slow-growing and 150 fast-growing 1 d old chicks were divided into three sub-groups with indoor raised slatted plastic floor, indoor concrete floor with rice hull litter, and free-range housing systems (2 genotype groups 3 housing systems). All birds were offered the same diet and were housed in similar conditions until they were 56 d old. At slaughter, 10 birds from each main group were selected randomly to determine the quality characteristics of the meat. In total, 60 breast meat pieces (pectoralis major muscle) and 60 legs of the chickens were used for meat quality analysis including pH, shear force, and colour characteristics such as lightness (), redness (), yellowness (), saturation (), and hue angle (). The pH of breast meat was significantly affected by genotype and housing system ( and ). There were significant genotype housing system interactions for pH ( and ) and shear force values ( and ) of leg and breast meat. There were no significant effects of genotype and housing system on leg and breast meat colour properties except for effects of genotype on redness () of breast meat () and effects of housing on redness of leg meat colour (). Slow-growing chickens and chickens housed in deep litter had a higher redness (darker) value of breast and leg meat colour compared to fast-growing birds and free range and slatted floor. In conclusion, it can be said that fast-growing broilers may be more appropriate for slatted plastic floor housing and slow-growing broilers may be more suitable for a free-range housing system, but further research on factors affecting meat quality would be very beneficial, especially in slow-growing broilers.
Highlights
There is a new trend in poultry meat consumption with a strong demand for meat from production systems, which ensures food security and animal welfare combined with environmental responsibility, consumer health, and better quality of the product
This study examined the effects of different housing systems for free-range, indoor deep-litter, and indoor raised slatted plastic floor systems; we examined the effects of two genotypes of broilers on breast and leg meat quality
The genotype × housing system interaction was significant for all carcass characteristics, meat pH, and shear force traits
Summary
There is a new trend in poultry meat consumption with a strong demand for meat from production systems, which ensures food security and animal welfare combined with environmental responsibility, consumer health, and better quality of the product. As a result of these, different housing and husbandry systems are becoming widespread in broiler meat production besides conventional production (Stadig et al, 2016; Mir et al, 2017; Sanchez-Casanova et al, 2020). There is a limited number of scientific findings that emphasize qualitative features of free-range production or alternative broiler meat production systems compared to the conventional system. Most authors reported a lower final body weight, poorer feed conversion efficiency, and better meat quality in freerange housing systems compared to conventional rearing (Bogosavljevic-Boslovic et al, 2012). Slow-growing genotypes are becoming popular in free-range production and organic chicken meat production due to some welfare problems of fast-growing broilers in conventional production (Hartcher and Lum, 2019; Louton, 2019)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.