Abstract

The effects of changes in the angle of pool impact plate, plunging depth, and discharge upon the dynamic pressure caused by ski-jump buckets were investigated in the laboratory. Four impact plate angles and four plunging depths were used. Discharges of 67, 86, 161, and 184 L/s were chosen. For any discharge, plunging depth and impact plate angle were regulated, and dynamic pressures were measured by a transducer. The results showed that with the increase in the ratio of drop length of the jet to its break-up length (H/Lb), and with an increase in the impact plate angle, the mean dynamic pressure coefficient decreased. An inspection of the plunging depth (Y) ratio to the initial thickness of the jet (Bj) revealed that when Y/Bj > 3, the plunging depth of the downstream pool reduced dynamic pressure. At the angle of 60°, the dynamic pressure coefficient due to increasing in plunging depth varied from 34% to 95%.

Highlights

  • Owing to dynamic pressures resulting from the flow in hydraulic structures, the river bed is frequently affected with scouring [1,2]

  • Steiner et al [4] conducted experiments on triangular jets, and compared parameters such as dynamic pressure over the bucket, as well as energy dissipation between triangular and circular buckets. Their results indicated that the relative energy dissipation hinges on the deflection angle and jet falling height from the take-off lip to tail water level

  • 8 shows that as the impact plate angle relative to the horizontal increases, the value of Cp decreases in allresearch, depth situations in the plunge

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Owing to dynamic pressures resulting from the flow in hydraulic structures, the river bed is frequently affected with scouring [1,2]. Steiner et al [4] conducted experiments on triangular jets, and compared parameters such as dynamic pressure over the bucket, as well as energy dissipation between triangular and circular buckets. Their results indicated that the relative energy dissipation hinges on the deflection angle and jet falling height from the take-off lip to tail water level. Jorabloo et al [5]

Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.