Abstract

This study proposes guidelines for predicting the failure mechanism of a shallow strip footing resting on geosynthetic-reinforced granular deposit at different stages of footing settlement. Physical model tests are performed on footings resting on unreinforced and geosynthetic-reinforced soil. The reinforcement parameters varied include the depth between consecutive reinforcements, number of layers and the depth of the reinforced zone. Additionally, contours of deformation and maximum shear strain of soil and mobilised tensile strain in reinforcement with increasing footing settlement are studied. The improvement of bearing capacity ratio and the peak tensile strain in the reinforcement was monitored for three normalised settlement ratios of 5% (low), 10% (medium) and 25% (high). The reinforced soil models were found to depict primarily a punching shear failure limited solely within the reinforced zone at s/B of 5%. This was supplemented with a well-formed triangular wedge in the underlying unreinforced soil at s/B of 10%. In addition to above mechanisms, the radial shear zones were prominent at s/B of 25%. Failure mechanisms have been proposed eventually for each s/B value investigated, including guidelines on the upper and lower bounds of the load dispersion angle in the reinforced soil and wedge angle of the underlying unreinforced soil.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call