Abstract
The physical layer security of downlink nonorthogonal multiple access (NOMA) network is analyzed. In order to improve the secrecy probability, friendly jammers are jointed in the NOMA network. Two jammer schemes are proposed in the NOMA network. All the jammers transmit jamming signal without jammer selection in the first scheme (NO JS scheme). Jammers are selected to transmit jamming signal if their interfering power on scheduled users is below a threshold in the second scheme (JS scheme). A stochastic geometry approach is applied to analyze the outage probability and the secrecy probability. Compared with the NO JS scheme and traditional scheme (without jointing jammers), the jammer selection scheme provides a good balance between the user outage probability and secrecy probability. Numerical results demonstrate that the security performance of the two proposed schemes can be improved by jointing the jammers in the NOMA wireless network.
Highlights
We present Monte Carlo simulations to evaluate the performance of the proposed scheme, and analytical results are illustrated and validated with extensive simulations in nonorthogonal multiple access (NOMA) network. e default parameters are listed in Table 1 unless otherwise stated
Our first proposed scheme is that all jammers are active without jammer selection in NOMA network, which is marked as “NO JS scheme.”
Default value 1/km2 10/km2 11/km2 100/km2 46 dBm 23 dBm 0.3 4 0.1 km scheme is that some jammers are active with jammer selection in NOMA network, which is marked “JS
Summary
E UE and EVE locations are distributed as an independent homogeneous PPP ΦU and ΦE with densities λU and λE, respectively. Existing results have shown that the NOMA group with more than two UEs may provide a better performance gain [18]. We assume λU ≫ λB so that a sufficient number of UEs can always be found to form the NOMA group in each cell. To enhance the security performance, friendly jammers are jointed in NOMA network. The threshold is the jammer exclusion zone around the scheduler user, i.e., ΦJS j | j ∈ ΦJ, PJR−j,aUi < PJD− a,. ΦUs denotes the point process of scheduled users. UE1 is assumed to be with a better normalized channel gain. All hi are assumed to be i.i.d. ri is the distance between BS0 and UEi. ni is the additive noise
Published Version (Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.