Abstract

To incorporate exchanger dimensions as a design objective in plate and fin heat exchangers, a variable that must be taken into consideration is the geometry of the finned surfaces to be used. In this work, a methodology to find the surface geometry that will produce the required heat transfer coefficient and pressure drop to achieve the design targets was developed. The geometry of secondary surfaces can be specified by the fin density, which represents the number of fins per unit length. All other geometrical features, as well as the thermo-hydraulic performance, can be derived from this parameter. This work showed the way finned surfaces are engineered employing generalised thermo-hydraulic correlations as a part of a design methodology. It also showed that there was a volume space referred to as volume design region (VDR) where heat duty, pressure drop, and dimensions could simultaneously be met. Such a volume design region was problem- and surface-specific; therefore, its limits were determined by the heat duty, the pressure drop, and the type of finned surface chosen in the design. The application of this methodology to a case study showed that a shell and tube heat exchanger of 227.4 m2, with the appropriate fin density using offset strip-fins, could be replaced by a plate and fin exchanger with any combination of height, width, and length in the ranges of 0–0.58 m, 0–0.58 m, and 0–3.59 m. The approach presented in this work indicated that heat exchanger dimensions could be fixed as a design objective, and they could effectively be achieved through surface design.

Highlights

  • The possibility of using many different types of secondary surfaces in design gives plate and fin heat exchangers a flexible degree of freedom to incorporate exchanger dimensions as a design objective, as shown in this paper

  • The geometry of a finned surface is a degree of freedom that can be used in the design of plate and fin exchangers if the unit dimensions are a constraint

  • Surfaces can be engineered or tailor-made to meet the exchanger dimensions, besides fulfilling the heat duty and pressure drop, provided no limitations exist to the manufacturing of any fin geometry

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The possibility of using many different types of secondary surfaces in design gives plate and fin heat exchangers a flexible degree of freedom to incorporate exchanger dimensions as a design objective, as shown in this paper. These types of exchangers were originally developed for gas-to-gas applications, but the development of the manufacturing techniques such as direct metal laser sintering (DMLS) made them suitable to process high pressure and temperature fluids [1]. The most common types of finned surfaces are plain, perforated, wavy, offset, and louvered.

Objectives
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call