Physical capacity, not skeletal maturity, distinguishes competitive levels in male Norwegian U14 soccerplayers.

Abstract

The main aim of the present study was to compare skeletal maturity level and physical capacities between male Norwegian soccer players playing at elite, sub-elite and non-elite level. Secondary, we aimed to investigate the association between skeletal maturity level and physical capacities. One hundred and two U14 soccer players (12.8-14.5years old) recruited from four local clubs, and a regional team were tested for bone age and physical capacities. Bone age was estimated with x-ray of their left hand and used to indicate maturation of the skeleton. Players went through a comprehensive test battery to assess their physical capacities. Between-groups analysis revealed no difference in chronological age, skeletal maturity level, leg strength, body weight, or stature. However, elite players were superior to sub-elite and non-elite players on important functional characteristics as intermittent-endurance capacity (running distance: 1664m±367 vs 1197m±338 vs 693m±235) and running speed (fastest 10m split time: 1.27seconds±0.06 vs 1.33seconds±0.10 vs 1.39seconds±0.11), in addition to maximal oxygen uptake ( ), standing long jump, and upper body strength (P<.05 for all comparisons). Medium-to-large correlations were found between skeletal maturity level and peak force (r=695, P<.01), power (r=684, P<.01), sprint (r=-.471, P<.001), and jump performance (r=.359, P<.01), but no correlation with upper body strength, , or intermittent-endurance capacity. These findings imply that skeletal maturity level does not bias the selection of players, although well-developed physical capacity clearly distinguishes competitive levels. The superior physical performance of the highest-ranked players seems related to an appropriate training environment.