Abstract

Abstract. Museums perform various tasks such as collecting, cataloguing and preserving the cultural heritage (CH). In addition, they have an institutional task, which is to disseminate the heritage, discovering the most efficient tools to tell how a monument to the origin could have looked. In this process of knowledge and dissemination, digital technologies play an important role. In fact, they allow building a digital archive in which virtual copies of found objects are available to scholars for more or less in-depth analysis. Digital archives of this type also allow the dissemination of scientific data, constituting, if published, databases accessible everywhere. The role of the digital archive is also to preserve the characteristics of the finds, which are often already deteriorated, without worsening the situation through their continuous manipulation or movement. Of course, the construction of digital copies must be done in the most rigorous way so as to guarantee scholars the truthfulness of the data being analysed, and building procedures as standardized as possible to allow their use even by unskilled personnel. Moreover, museums have the very complex task of communicating the heritage, which envisages two steps: reconstruction and communication. The first phase, reconstruction, is a very complex operation, especially in the archaeological field, where there are few documents and the hypotheses are based on principles of similarity. Since no direct reference is available, the reconstruction takes place through comparison with similar objects from the same period, the same area and with the same function. Communication, then, has the task of disseminating the results and the hypotheses made, with the most appropriate tools. 3D printing allows to build three-dimensional models of reality, and therefore immediately comprehensible, even of complex forms, not always achievable with the traditional tools of modelling tools. This article describes this complex process, and its application to the funerary aediculae monument at the Museo Archeologico di Mantova, on the occasion of the refurbishment of the museum and its exhibits. In this experience, the use of new technologies is being investigated in combination with more traditional methods of representation, the maquette, but not less effective.

Highlights

  • Museums in general, but the archaeological ones in particular, play a dual role

  • The experience, split up in several phases, has seen the digitization of the findings that can be connected to the funerary monuments excavated in Sarsina (Forlì-Cesena), the use of models for the verification of hypotheses conducted on the basis of comparisons with other monuments and the construction of a physical model that tells the results of research conducted

  • The experience described in the article concerns the reconstruction of a funerary monument at the Museo Archeologico Nazionale di Mantova

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

But the archaeological ones in particular, play a dual role. On the one hand, they often serve as an archive for all the archaeological finds of the territories belonging to the museum. This means elaborating reconstructions, through the findings and their relocation, useful for telling how a monument might appear like at the origin In these respects, digital technologies can play an important role. Digital technologies can play an important role They make it possible to build a digital archive in which virtual copies of the findings are available to scholars for analysis (Gonizzi Barsanti, Guidi, 2013). The construction of digital copies must be done in the most rigorous way so as to guarantee to scholars the truthfulness of the data that is being analysed It is, a matter of using technologies and tools that, in addition to how the object is perceived, are able to provide a representation as accurate and realistic as possible. The experience, split up in several phases, has seen the digitization of the findings that can be connected to the funerary monuments excavated in Sarsina (Forlì-Cesena), the use of models for the verification of hypotheses conducted on the basis of comparisons with other monuments and the construction of a physical model that tells the results of research conducted

METHODS AND GOALS
The documentation
The maquette
Archaeological description of the study case
Digitization
The model and the museum set-up
CONCLUSIONS
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call