Abstract
Physical and dosimetric characteristics of HDMLC were studied for SRS6, 6, and 10 MV X‐rays from Novalis Tx. This in‐built tertiary collimator consists of 60 pairs (32×0.25 cm; 26×0.5 cm and 2×0.7 cm) of leaves. Properties of HDMLC studied included alignment, readout and radiation field congruence, radiation penumbra, accuracy and reproducibility of leaf position and gap width, static and dynamic leaf shift, tongue‐and‐groove effect, leaf transmission and leakage, leaf travel speed, and delivery of dynamic conformal arc and IMRT. All tests were performed using a calibrated ionization chamber, film dosimetry and DynaLog file analysis. Alignment of leaves with isocenter plane was better than 0.03 cm at all gantry and collimator positions. The congruence of HDMLC readout and radiation field agreed to within ± 0.03cm for filed sizes ranging from 1×1 to 20×20 cm2. Mean 80% to 20% penumbra width parallel (perpendicular) to leaf motion was 0.24±0.05(0.21±0.02) cm, 0.37±0.12(0.29±0.07) cm, and 0.51±0.13(0.43±0.07) cm for SRS6, 6, and 10 MV X‐rays, respectively. Circular field penumbra was comparable to corresponding square field. Average penumbra of 1×20 cm2 field was effectively constant over off‐axis positions of up to 12 cm with mean value of 0.16 (± 0.01)cm at 1.5 cm depth and 0.38 (± 0.04)cm at 10 cm depth. Minimum and maximum effective penumbra along the straight diagonal edge of irregular fields increased from 0.3 and 0.32 cm at 70° steep angle to 0.35 and 0.56 cm at 20° steep angle. Modified Picket Fence test showed average FWHM of 0.18 cm and peak‐to‐peak distance of 1.99 cm for 0.1 cm band and 2 cm interband separation. Dynamic multileaf collimation (DMLC) output factor remained within ± 1% for 6 MV and ± 0.5% for 10 MV X‐rays at all gantry positions, and was reproducible within ± 0.5% over a period of 14 months. The static leaf shift was 0.03 cm for all energies, while dynamic leaf shift was 0.044 cm for 10 MV and 0.039 cm for both SRS6 and 6 MV X‐rays. The dose depression and corresponding tongue‐and‐groove size were 24% and 0.17 cm for 6 MV and 19% and 0.20 cm for 10 MV X‐rays. Average transmission through HDMLC was 1.09%, 1.14% and 1.34% for SRS6, 6 and 10 MV X‐rays. Analysis of DynaLog files for leaf speed test in arc dynamic mode, delivery test of dynamic conformal arc, and step‐and‐shoot and sliding window IMRT showed at least 95% or more of the error counts had misplacements < 0.2cm, with maximum root mean square (RMS) error value calculated at 0.13 cm. Accurate and reproducible leaf position and gap width, and less leakage and small consistent penumbra over the fields demonstrate HDMLC suitable for high‐dose resolution SRS and IMRT.PACS number: 87.56.N‐, 87.55.Qr, 87.50.cm, 87.55.de, 87.53.Ly
Highlights
The last two decades have witnessed a continuous development in the multileaf collimator (MLC) hardware and controller software technology
All linear accelerator manufacturers support MLCs for conformal treatment and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT).(1-5) Different types of MLC design, operating limits, commissioning and quality assurance (QA) requirements, and physical characteristics were extensively reported in AAPM Report No 72.(5) The MLCs differ in physical dimension, leaf side and end design, and in the way they integrate into the collimator assembly
These conventional MLCs with relatively large leaf widths – mostly 1 cm at isocenter – resulted in inferior conformation of dose to small targets generally treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS).(6) Micro-MLC having a thinner projected leaf width of about 0.3 cm was introduced either as an add-on accessory to the existing linac or in-built in a dedicated linac for application in SRS.[6,7,8,9] a mMLC suffers from a maximum limited field size of about 10 × 10 cm2
Summary
The last two decades have witnessed a continuous development in the multileaf collimator (MLC) hardware and controller software technology. All linear accelerator (linac) manufacturers support MLCs for conformal treatment and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT).(1-5) Different types of MLC design, operating limits, commissioning and quality assurance (QA) requirements, and physical characteristics were extensively reported in AAPM Report No 72.(5) The MLCs differ in physical dimension, leaf side and end design, and in the way they integrate into the collimator assembly These conventional MLCs with relatively large leaf widths – mostly 1 cm at isocenter – resulted in inferior conformation of dose to small targets generally treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS).(6) Micro-MLC (mMLC) having a thinner projected leaf width of about 0.3 cm was introduced either as an add-on accessory to the existing linac or in-built in a dedicated linac for application in SRS.[6,7,8,9] a mMLC suffers from a maximum limited field size of about 10 × 10 cm.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.