Abstract

Quantification of physical activity and sedentary behavior in the free-living environment is important when seeking to understand potential physiological consequences and/or benefits. Objective monitors allow researchers to evaluate physical activity and sedentary behavior in the free-living environment using a variety of modalities. PURPOSE: To compare occupational (OPA) and non-occupational (NOPA) physical activity and sedentary behavior among Emergency Department (ED) nurses using the StewWatch-3 (SW), Omron HJ-303 (O), NL-2000 (NL), and ActivPal (AP). METHODS: Thirteen ED nurses (10 women) consented to participate in the study and wore the devices for seven days. Paired-samples t-tests were used to determine differences between occupational and non-occupational steps per day, standing time, stepping time, and time spent sitting/lying down. RESULTS: ED nurses averaged 7,713-16,032 and 7,181-9,119 steps per day for OPA and NOPA, respectively. The SW, NL, and AP counted significantly more steps during occupational days (P<0.05). The AP counted significantly more time standing and time spent stepping during occupational days (P<0.05). In addition, the AP counted significantly less time spent while sitting/lying down during occupational days (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: During occupational days ED nurses walk more and spend significantly less time sitting/lying down. Due to technological advancements, many jobs are becoming more sedentary. Because of their occupational physical activity demands, ED nurses may be a population of interest for researchers interested in the physiological benefits of physical activity and the physiological consequences of sedentary behavior.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call