Abstract

We characterized the genetic diversity, phylogeography, and demography of Tor sp. (Cyprinidae) from Sabah, Malaysian Borneo, by examining nucleotide variation in the D-loop region of the mtDNA. Sequence analysis of 18 populations (N = 173) yielded 35 unique mtDNA haplotypes with mean haplotype and nucleotide diversity of 0.833 and 0.023, respectively. Phylogenetic reconstructions using Bayesian, neighbor-joining, and maximum parsimony methods, as well as haplotype network, revealed four well-defined clades, namely, the eastern, central, northwestern, and southwestern clades, which corresponded to evolutionarily significant units (ESUs). These ESUs were estimated to have become separated since the late Miocene to Pliocene era (between 5 and 1 million years ago), with the central highlands of Sabah Crocker Trusmadi Range (CTR) constituting the main barrier to genetic exchange between clades. Analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) and pairwise genetic differentiation showed significant population structuring (Φct = 0.575–1.000, p < 0.05). We further identified eight major groups of river systems harboring reproductively isolated Tor subpopulations. Neutrality statistics and Bayesian skyline plots (BSP) suggested constant population size over time for most Tor populations. Tor sp. in Sabah is comprised of four ESUs (eastern, central, northwestern, and southwestern ESUs), and that each ESU can be compartmentalized into 1–4 MUs. Due to isolation by distance, the highest number of MU occurs in the low-elevation drainages of Eastern Sabah, which is the largest in terms of land area. The evidence provided by this study supports the hypothesis that the four ESU represent genetically distinct subpopulations of Tor and highlight the urgent need for the in situ conservation of these subpopulations.

Highlights

  • Resources for the conservation of biodiversity are limited

  • The current study showed Tor populations appear to be significantly structured into geographically discrete subpopulations across drainages

  • Given that all clades are historically isolated, monophyletic, and having a high level of genetic differentiation [79], fulfilling the criteria of an ecologically significant units (ESUs) [5,97,98]; this study suggests that all clades were treated as an ESU

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Prioritizing allocation to conservation units (CUs) consisting of intraspecific-level groups that are ecologically, genetically, and phylogenetically distinct is an optimum approach to protecting imperiled species [1,2]. Based on definitions in the work of [5], an ESU is used sensu lato, to refer to a conspecific group that is phylogenetically distinct (i.e., monophyletic), whereas an MU is a subset of an ESU that possesses a minor but significantly discrepant set of alleles and/or haplotypes. The latter may constitute a polyphyletic group sensu [6]

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call