Abstract

BackgroundTribe Orchideae dominates the orchid flora of the temperate Northern Hemisphere but its representatives in East Asia had been subject to less intensive phylogenetic study than those in Eurasia and North America. Although this situation was improved recently by the molecular phylogenetic study of Jin et al., comparatively few species were analyzed from the species-rich and taxonomically controversial East Asian Amitostigma alliance. Here, we present a framework nrITS tree of 235 accessions of Orchideae plus an in-depth analysis of 110 representative accessions, encompassing most widely recognized species within the alliance, to elucidate their relationships.ResultsWe used parsimony, likelihood and Bayesian approaches to generate trees from data for two nuclear (nrITS, low-copy Xdh) and four chloroplast (matK, psbA-trnH, trnL-F, trnS-trnG) markers. Nuclear and plastid data were analyzed separately due to a few hard incongruences that most likely reflect chloroplast capture. Our results suggest key phylogenetic placements for Sirindhornia and Brachycorythis, and confirm previous assertions that the Amitostigma alliance is monophyletic and sister to the Eurasian plus European clades of subtribe Orchidinae. Seven robust clades are evident within the alliance, but none corresponds precisely with any of the traditional genera; the smaller and more morphologically distinct genera Tsaiorchis, Hemipilia, Neottianthe and Hemipiliopsis are monophyletic but each is nested within a polyphyletic plexus of species attributed to either Ponerorchis or the most plesiomorphic genus, Amitostigma. Two early-divergent clades that escaped analysis by Jin et al. undermine their attempt to circumscribe an expanded monophyletic genus Ponerorchis.ConclusionsWe provide a new framework on the complex phylogenetic relationships between Amitostigma and other genera traditionally included in its alliance; based on which, we combine the entire Amitostigma alliance into a morphologically and molecularly circumscribed Amitostigma sensu latissimo that also contains seven molecularly circumscribed sections. Our molecular trees imply unusually high levels of morphological homoplasy, but these will need to be quantified via a future group-wide review of the alliance based on living plants if morphology is to be fully integrated into our classification.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12862-015-0376-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Highlights

  • Tribe Orchideae dominates the orchid flora of the temperate Northern Hemisphere but its representatives in East Asia had been subject to less intensive phylogenetic study than those in Eurasia and North America

  • Initial tribe-wide analyses used nrITS via a composite dataset that consisted of samples of the present study, the relevant sequences used by Bateman et al [35], and several additional sequences downloaded from GenBank

  • Employing DNA markers additional to those used in previous studies – the coding nuclear gene Xdh and non-coding chloroplast regions psbA-trnH, trnL-F and trnS-trnG – our results shed valuable new light on these orchids, on relationships within the genus and on the more complex relationships between Amitostigma and other genera traditionally included in its alliance: Ponerorchis, Hemipilia, Neottianthe, Tsaiorchis and Hemipiliopsis

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Tribe Orchideae dominates the orchid flora of the temperate Northern Hemisphere but its representatives in East Asia had been subject to less intensive phylogenetic study than those in Eurasia and North America. This situation was improved recently by the molecular phylogenetic study of Jin et al, comparatively few species were analyzed from the species-rich and taxonomically controversial East Asian Amitostigma alliance. Blume [9] was the first taxonomist to recognize the genus, based on a single Japanese species gracile, though his chosen generic name “Mitostigma” was later shown to be a homonym used by Decaisne in 1844 for a genus of Asclepiadaceae This genus remained monotypic and largely neglected for decades, until Schlechter [10] established the new genus Amitostigma based on the original type of “Mitostigma”. Only Chen et al [15] offered some discussion of evolutionary trends in the genus

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call