Abstract

Two‐wing flyingfish (Exocoetus spp.) are widely distributed, epipelagic, mid‐trophic organisms that feed on zooplankton and are preyed upon by numerous predators (e.g., tunas, dolphinfish, tropical seabirds), yet an understanding of their speciation and systematics is lacking. As a model of epipelagic fish speciation and to investigate mechanisms that increase biodiversity, we studied the phylogeny and biogeography of Exocoetus, a highly abundant holoepipelagic fish taxon of the tropical open ocean. Morphological and molecular data were used to evaluate the phylogenetic relationships, species boundaries, and biogeographic patterns of the five putative Exocoetus species. We show that the most widespread species (E. volitans) is sister to all other species, and we find no evidence for cryptic species in this taxon. Sister relationship between E. monocirrhus (Indo‐Pacific) and E. obtusirostris (Atlantic) indicates the Isthmus of Panama and/or Benguela Barrier may have played a role in their divergence via allopatric speciation. The sister species E. peruvianus and E. gibbosus are found in different regions of the Pacific Ocean; however, our molecular results do not show a clear distinction between these species, indicating recent divergence or ongoing gene flow. Overall, our phylogeny reveals that the most spatially restricted species are more recently derived, suggesting that allopatric barriers may drive speciation, but subsequent dispersal and range expansion may affect the distributions of species.

Highlights

  • Marine fish habitats are typically large, continuous, and lack definitive boundaries

  • We focused on the following questions: (1) What are the phylogenetic relationships within Exocoetus based on molecular data, and how do they compare to the most recent morphological hypothesis? (2) Do the currently recognized Exocoetus species represent distinct monophyletic lineages, and are there cryptic species? (3) What biogeographic patterns of speciation are revealed by phylogenetic arrangements within this genus?

  • Our analyses show sister clades of E. monocirrhus – E. obtusirostris and

Read more

Summary

| INTRODUCTION

Marine fish habitats are typically large, continuous, and lack definitive boundaries. Phylogenies can clarify species identity when taxa are morphologically very similar (cryptic species), thereby improving understanding of species geographic distributions (Bass et al, 2005; Colborn et al, 2001; Quattro et al, 2005). Comprehensive species phylogenies can provide key insights regarding speciation in marine lineages with high dispersal potential, wide ranges, and overlapping distributions. Through extensive sampling and phylogenetic analysis, we improve the resolution of evolutionary lineages within Exocoetus, thereby providing new data (a) E. gibbosus

| MATERIALS AND METHODS
Findings
| DISCUSSION
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call